icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm

DOJ to ban stop-and-frisk?

DOJ to ban stop-and-frisk?
New York City’s contentious stop-and-frisk policy might be soon brought to a halt. City, state and federal officials have asked the US Department of Justice to consider investigating the NYPD’s controversial detainment program.

The Justice Department may soon weigh in on the New York Police Department’s continuously problematic stop-and-frisk program following a discussion on Thursday with critics still outraged by the ongoing policies considered rampant with profiling by many.This week’s news about a possible end to the stop-and-frisk policies comes less than a month after a federal judge granted class action status to a lawsuit filed years earlier challenging the constitutionality of the department’s ongoing practice of detaining civilians based on alleged probable cause that many say is often determined by nothing more than race. Last year the NYPD stopped 685,724 people, and while 87 percent of those subsequently frisked were either black or Latino, the odds of a person from that sample actually being found guilty of a crime was only 1-out-of-10, reports the American Civil Liberties Union.“This case presents an issue of great public concern: the disproportionate number of Blacks and Latinos, as compared to Whites, who become entangled in the criminal justice system,” US District Judge Shira Scheindlin wrote in last month’s ruling. “The specific claims raised in this case are narrower but they are raised in the context of the extensively documented racial disparities in the rates of stops, arrests, convictions, and sentences that continue through the present day.”Now that the stop-and-frisk suit has been granted class action status, additional plaintiffs are being asked to come forth and join the prosecution against the NYPD. Only weeks after that ruling, though, local and national lawmakers are joining forces to oppose the department’s policies outside of a court of law."If you look at the numbers, no matter how you slice stop, question and frisk, it is a racist and prejudicial policy that violates civil rights and civil liberties," New York City Councilman Jumaane Williams said during Thursday’s discussions.As opposition becomes more and more rampant over the alleged racial profiling, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and NYPD Commissioner Ray Kelly have by-and-large defended the department’s policies. Last month Mayor Bloomberg claimed that the NYPD’s tactics, love them or hate them, shouldn’t prompt anyone involved to have to say they’re sorry because under his watch their initiatives have ended violent crimes."Nobody should ask Ray Kelly to apologize – he's not going to and neither am I – for saving 5,600 live,” insisted the mayor. When approached by reporters at a press conference weeks later with information confirming that the stop-and-frisks have not significantly caused a drop in crime, the mayor reportedly admitted, “I know that.”"I mean, it’s worrisome. And Ray Kelly is working on it," he said, reports DNAInfo.com. "There are still too many guns."On Thursday’s meeting, Councilman Williams revealed that he isn’t exactly on board with the mayor, either."It's clear that the mayor and commissioner – in the face of everything that points to this policy being unjust, unfair, racist, prejudiced and most importantly ineffective – won't do anything about it," Williams said. "Their lack of leadership is forcing us to do other things."

Dear readers and commenters,

We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system.

Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments,

RT Team.