Fauci DID fund Wuhan virus experiments, but officials insist virus involved ‘could not have been’ cause of Covid-19 pandemic
In a letter sent to Republican lawmakers on Wednesday, the NIH’s principal deputy director, Lawrence Tabak, admitted that a nonprofit called EcoHealth Alliance did conduct experiments on coronaviruses in China with NIH funding, but denied this had anything to do with the virus that causes Covid-19.
“The limited experiment described in the final progress report provided by EcoHealth Alliance was testing if spike proteins from naturally occurring bat coronaviruses circulating in China were capable of binding to the human ACE2 receptor in a mouse model,” Tabak wrote. The mice infected with the SHC014 WIV1 bat coronavirus “became sicker than those infected with the WIV1 bat coronavirus,” he added.
NEW: HHS letters, back-up docs on Wuhan Lab. States analysis confirms “bat coronaviruses studied under the EcoHealth Alliance grant could not have been the source of..COVID-19 pandemic” but found “EcoHealth failed to report” certain findings “required by the terms of the grant” + pic.twitter.com/fQdT9yLSXH— Catherine Herridge (@CBS_Herridge) October 20, 2021
“Regardless, the viruses being studied under this grant were genetically very distant from SARS-CoV-2,” the virus causing Covid-19, Tabak insisted. He attached a genetic analysis of the virus used in NIH research (WIV-1), along with SARS-CoV-2, the original SARS virus, as well as RaTG13, “one of the closest bat coronavirus relatives to SARS-CoV-2 collected by the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” and BANAL-52, a bat coronavirus recently identified in Laos.
While there is a 96-97% similarity between SARS-CoV-2 and the RaTG13 and BANAL-52 bat coronaviruses, they are “far too divergent” to have been its progenitors, Tabak said, pointing out that humans and chimpanzees have the same degree of genetic similarity.
“The analysis attached confirms that the bat coronaviruses studied under the EcoHealth Alliance grant could not have been the source of SARS-CoV-2 and the COVID-19 pandemic,” he wrote.
Fauci has repeatedly brushed off claims that his National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) or the NIH funded such research, even after being presented with documents showing they gave money to EcoHealth Alliance, which partnered with the Wuhan Institute of Virology to research bat coronaviruses potentially infecting humans.
It was EcoHealth head Peter Daszak who spearheaded efforts to denounce the ‘lab leak theory’ of the virus’ origin as a conspiracy, which was then used by social media platforms to censor critics.
Tabak’s letter does not mention the phrase ‘gain of function’, but speaks instead of “research involving enhanced pathogens of pandemic potential (ePPP),” and says the NIH determined it did not fit the definition of such research “because these bat coronaviruses had not been shown to infect humans.”Also on rt.com Mother, may I? Americans have lost their spines if they need Fauci’s blessing to gather for the holidays
Critics quickly pointed out that this amounts to word games. Senator Rand Paul (R-Kentucky), who has repeatedly challenged Fauci on gain-of-function funding, pointed to the letter and said the research involved absolutely fits the definition.
“If the experiment combines unknown viruses and tests their ability to infect and damage humanized cells, of course the result is ‘unknown’ before the experiment,” Paul tweeted. “But it is not ‘unexpected’ that the virus gains in function,” he added, pointing to the mice in the experiment getting sicker.
So, if this type of experiment created a virus that had 50% mortality (like MERS which they have experimented with in Wuhan), that result would be “unknown" before the experiment but not “unexpected.” pic.twitter.com/WmJsjSaCh1— Senator Rand Paul (@RandPaul) October 21, 2021
Dr. Richard Ebright of Rutgers University told the National Review that the NIH-funded work by EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan lab “epitomizes” the definition of gain-of-function research.
“Fauci emphatically denied that money went toward so-called 'gain of function' research,” Ebright tweeted on Thursday. “Fauci now has lied to Congress three times on the same subject. Knowingly, willfully, and brazenly. And, so far, with complete impunity.”
Fauci has repeatedly clashed with Paul on the subject, insisting that neither the NIH nor his institute ever worked with the WIV, or that EcoHealth Alliance grants were significant or amounted to gain-of-function research. “You don’t know what you’re talking about,” he told the senator in a heated exchange in July. Paul responded by referring Fauci to the Justice Department for lying to Congress.
May 12: "The NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute"May 26: "That is correct" that the NIH never funded gain of functionJuly 20: "I have never lied before the Congress and I do not retract my statement." pic.twitter.com/hfXQorHv1e— X Strategies LLC (@XStrategiesLLC) October 21, 2021
The exact origin of SARS-CoV-2 remains a mystery. The Chinese government has emphatically rejected the possibility it may have leaked from the WIV lab, accidentally or on purpose – instead accusing the US of developing the virus as a bioweapon and sending it to China. The letter organized by Daszak last spring insisted it could not have been genetically engineered, but must have evolved naturally in some kind of animal species – offering no evidence of either.
Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!