icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm
7 May, 2021 17:27

Tesla admits Elon Musk is exaggerating about ‘full self-driving’ cars before end of year – reports

Tesla admits Elon Musk is exaggerating about ‘full self-driving’ cars before end of year – reports

Communications between Tesla and the California Department of Motor Vehicles have revealed that billionaire Elon Musk may be overhyping the capabilities of his ‘Autopilot’ self-driving software.

A DMV memo – obtained through a public records request by PlainSite – claims that a boast from Musk about self-driving cars “does not match engineering reality,” based on a conversation with the director of the Autopilot software, CJ Moore. 

“Tesla is at Level 2 currently,” the department wrote. Level two for a self-automated driving system means the software requires human supervision. Level five autonomy would mean the cars can drive themselves anywhere without direct human supervision.

In a January earnings call, Musk said he was “highly confident the car will be able to drive itself with reliability in excess of human this year.”

Also on rt.com ‘Starship has landed’: WATCH Elon Musk’s rocket touch down WITHOUT exploding

The DMV reportedly does not believe this level of autonomy can be reached by the end of the year after its conversations with Tesla. 

“Tesla indicated that Elon is extrapolating on the rates of improvement when speaking about L5 capabilities. Tesla couldn’t say if the rate of improvement would make it to L5 by end of calendar year,” the memo reads.

It later stated that “the public’s misunderstanding about the limits of the technology and its misuse can have tragic consequences.”

This all appears to contradict Musk’s public statements in the past – and communications from December between Tesla’s associate general counsel Eric Williams and the chief of California DMV’s autonomous vehicles branch, Miguel Acosta, show there was just as much doubt about the so-called ‘autonomous’ cars then. 

Williams noted that “neither Autopilot nor FSD (Full Self-driving) Capability is an autonomous system, and currently no comprising feature, whether singularly or collectively, is autonomous or makes our vehicles autonomous.”

There have been multiple crashes involving Tesla vehicles and their Autopilot systems, including a recent one in Spring, Texas that left two men dead after their vehicle crashed into a tree. The crash is currently being investigated, but Tesla has said the Autopilot feature was not engaged at the time of the crash. 

Also on rt.com Two killed in ‘driverless’ Tesla, possibly using ‘Autopilot’ feature, as Elon Musk touts company's safety record

Tesla’s website describes their Autopilot as the “future of driving,” but cautions that it needs “active driver supervision.” 

Musk has touted the safety record of the Autopilot software, tweeting last month: “Tesla with Autopilot engaged now approaching 10 times lower chance of accident than average vehicle.”

In a 2018 investors call, Musk reportedly claimed that “serious accidents” with Autopilot “almost always” can be chalked up to experienced drivers becoming “complacent.”

Like this story? Share it with a friend!