icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm
5 Dec, 2019 05:21

Pentagon denies report Trump considering DOUBLING Mid East build-up with 14,000 more troops

Pentagon denies report Trump considering DOUBLING Mid East build-up with 14,000 more troops

The Pentagon has refuted reports that the Trump administration is mulling whether to beef up US forces in the Middle East with up to 14,000 troops, which would have doubled the number of soldiers deployed in the region since May.

The Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday that the White House was studying the option of sending the 14,000 troops in addition to scores of warships and other hardware to the Middle East under the pretext of countering an “Iranian threat.”

Citing US officials, the WSJ report said Trump was expected to make up his mind on the matter by the end of this month, and that he still could settle for a smaller number of troops. The move could have potentially inflamed tensions between Washington and Tehran, who saw a massive US build-up at its own doorstep with 14,000 US troops having been deployed to the region between May and October.

Shortly after the report came out, however, it was shot down by the Pentagon’s spokesperson Alyssa Farah.

“This reporting by the @WSJ is wrong. The U.S. is not sending 14,000 troops to the Middle East to confront Iran,” Farah tweeted, throwing cold water on the claim. 

With many on Twitter pointing out that the original report did not say that the deployment was a foregone conclusion, but that Trump was still weighing the option, Farah later clarified that the US was not even “considering” sending thousands of additional troops to the area.

However, it remains a matter of  speculation whether the Trump administration could still go for a build-up, albeit possibly on a smaller scale.

Tensions between Iran and the US have soared since Trump withdrew from America’s end of a landmark nuclear accord signed with Teheran in 2015, reintroducing punitive measures relaxed under the deal and slapping the country with a fresh batch of crippling economic sanctions – dubbing it a “maximum pressure” campaign aimed at reducing Iran’s energy imports to zero. The relationship, already strained, took another turn for the worse following the September 14 attack on Saudi oil infrastructure, claimed by Yemen’s Houthi rebels, but blamed by Washington on Teheran. The US has since been flexing its military muscles with its eyes on Iranian shores, deploying a carrier strike group and a bomber task force to the region earlier this year, as well as reportedly carrying out several cyberwarfare operations against Iran. 

Also on rt.com Stealth aggression: US attacked Iran with cyberweapons, including after Saudi oil refinery airstrike – reports

Despite Trump’s insistence that he wants to get the US out of all “endless wars,” there have been recurrent rumors that Washington is ready to send thousands of troops to the Middle East to fend off the “Iranian threat” at the behest of its Israeli ally. 

Back in October, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said that Israel had the “fundamental” right to violate international borders while hunting down any “Iranian positions” across the region, vowing to throw full US support behind the endeavor. 

Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!

Podcasts
0:00
27:26
0:00
27:2