icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm
18 Feb, 2016 04:21

‘Troubling precedent’: Google CEO rallies for Apple over FBI encryption case

‘Troubling precedent’: Google CEO rallies for Apple over FBI encryption case

In five tweets, Google’s CEO finally rallied for Apple over its encryption case with the FBI. The FBI has demanded through a court order that Apple enable the hacking of a San Bernardino shooter’s iPhone.

Google CEO Sundar Pichai said the request “could be a troubling precedent.” The tweets on Wednesday followed a chorus of privacy supporters demanding the search giant break its silence on the Apple vs. FBI case.

Earlier in the day, National Security Agency whistleblower Edward Snowden had chimed in, suggesting Google’s silence on the tech case implied the company had already sided with the government.

The tweet was shared over 7,907 times and liked over 6,128 times

In another tweet, a poster suggested that one tech giant should support another.

Pichai’s tweets are more cautious than those posted by Apple CEO Tim Cook on Tuesday, in which he wrote, “We feel we must speak up in the face of what we see as an overreach by the US government,” but that’s possibly because their businesses are different. Google’s business model is based on profiting from the data it freely collects from its users, while Apple creates products and is not as interested in its users’ data.

The difference could also be viewed as a human rights issue, according to the American Civil Liberties Union’s principal technologist, Chris Soghoian. Last year, he spoke at an EmTech conference at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and pointed to the massive price discrepancy between a new iPhone and a new smartphone powered by Google’s Android software. He argued there is the creation of a “second-class citizen.”

“We now find ourselves in not just a digital divide but a digital security divide,” Soghoian said, reported the MIT Technology Review. “The phone used by the rich is encrypted by default and cannot be surveilled, and the phone used by most people in the global south and the poor and disadvantaged in America can be surveilled.”

Apple’s latest mobile products automatically encrypt data stored on a device that the company can’t unlock. Its messaging and video chat apps use end-to-end encryption, which the company can’t read unless a user has enabled Apple’s iCloud backup service.

Users of Google Android software are not so well protected. Google’s Hangout text and video chat service does not use end-to-end encryption.

Soghoian said that means anyone using a cheap Android device is a much easier target for law enforcement or intelligence agencies, which are prone to abusing their surveillance powers. He cited, as an example, the way the FBI tapped Martin Luther King’s phone calls. Additionally, he fears that through the ubiquitous use of mobile devices, activists of today and tomorrow will become easier targets.

“The next civil rights movement will use the technology against which surveillance works best,” he said.

While he noted that protest movements don’t typically start in society’s upper socioeconomic echelons, he hoped drawing attention to the differences will shakes up the companies like Apple, Google and Facebook.