US claims Russia is ‘in part’ to blame for Syrian talks’ halt, misquotes UN as proof

Washington has accused Russia of being “in part” a reason for the temporary halting of the Syrian peace talks, muddling the official UN statement in order to back their claim, and failing to identify other reasons which contributed to the suspension.

Opening Wednesday’s briefing, State Department spokesperson John Kirby spoke of Russia’s strikes in Syria as being aimed “almost exclusively on the opposition” before leading into comments about the UN’s pausing of the Syrian peace talks until February 25.

READ MORE: Syria peace talks in Geneva LIVE UPDATES

This train of thought led Kirby to misquote UN Special Envoy for Syria Staffan de Mistura’s statement. His words were pounced upon by AP’s Matt Lee, who asked him to clarify whether the State Department had been pointing a finger at Russia for the Geneva talks’ “breakdown.”

“I said in part because of the disruptions to humanitarian aid and the continual attacks on civilian targets,” Kirby replied, referring to the UN’s statement, during which de Mistura was stressed that the suspension was only “a temporary pause” and not the end or failure of the talks.

Lee: “Right. Well, okay, let’s – in part, what else is it due to?”

Kirby:“Well, I wasn’t privy to the discussions over there. I’d point you to what Mr. de Mistura said.”

However, Kirby appears to have played loosely with the official statement here.

“He [de Mistura] did cite the difficulties that the military activities by Russia and the regime are having in terms of demonstrating a good faith effort by the regime to have negotiations and talks, but I’m not privy to every issue that they’ve raised – the opposition has raised with Mr. de Mistura,” Kirby told Lee.

This comment came soon after the UN mediator suspended the peace talks just two days in, citing differences between the Syrian government and opposition delegations on the priority of humanitarian issues.

When asked if the recent military escalation by the Syrian government troops and the Russian airstrikes “basically bombed your talks,” de Mistura replied: “I’m not referring to military activities.”

“I’m saying to an impossibility through military activities and other reasons for the fact that the humanitarian signals which are meant to be sent to the Syrian people – for instance lifting of the sieges, for instance the access for all the places which are at the moment unreachable – should be seen,” he said without mentioning Russia’s military.

RT correspondent Gayane Chichakyan asked the State Department to clarify “which groups were under attack” that Kirby referred to in his opening statement.

“I don’t have the list of every group, but it has been widely known that they have – that the Russians have not targeted Daesh [the Arabic name for Islamic State] to a great extent,” Kirby replied, stressing again that strikes were aimed “much more against opposition groups.”

The accusations have been rebuked by Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Gennady Gatilov, who said that such “attempts” to disrupt the peace process is “absolutely unacceptable” because it is a matter of “dealing with the terrorist threat in the country.”

The decision to postpone the Geneva talks came as the Syrian government forces ending a 3.5-year siege of the Shi’ite towns of Nubul and al-Zahraa, moving one step closer to recapturing Aleppo.

“I believe this will change the equation there and it could be a turning point. Aleppo is actually very close to falling, partly or fully, to the hands of the Syrian official forces,” Abdel Bari Atwan, editor of the London-based Al-Quds Al-Arabi newspaper, told RT.