Senate’s Iran bill won’t require Tehran to recognize Israel – reports
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky) did not explicitly say that he will file for cloture on the bill, which would bring an end to debate and block the chamber from voting on a series of controversial amendments, but his comments Tuesday suggested that he will only allow votes on less divisive amendments.
“We’re going to move quickly,” McConnell said after meeting with his caucus, McClatchy reported. “We're still hoping there’s a way forward that will give some of our members an opportunity to have votes on some of their amendments, but we anticipate finishing the Iran bill very soon.”
Generally speaking, the bill currently being considered by the Senate would allow Congress to voice its approval or disapproval of sanctions relief for Iran in the event of a deal. It would also require the Obama administration to file frequent reports with lawmakers on the status of any deal that goes forward. However, some lawmakers have been hoping to force further concessions from Iran by way of amendments.
— The Hill (@thehill) May 5, 2015
Some of the proposals that Democrats argue will sink any hope of seeing a bill through the Senate include one that would require Tehran to recognize Israel as part of any deal over its nuclear program. Another amendment would mandate that Iran close down all of its nuclear facilities and reveal the history of its entire program.
The Obama administration has resisted adding requirements like these, arguing that they would torpedo the prospect of reaching a deal with Iran. As Democrats balked, negotiations between lawmakers continued, with McConnell hoping to strike some kind of deal that would permit votes on some amendments.
On Tuesday, Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn), who is the sponsor of the bill, said he expects McConnell to file cloture and move forward with a bill this week that won’t feature votes on divisive requirements.
“My sense is that cloture is going to be filed,” Corker said, according to The Hill.“My sense is that Thursday there's a very strong chance that we'll get an overwhelming vote.”
Some Republicans were unhappy with the idea and voiced their frustration to the press.
"I haven’t understood it for four years being here, going on to my fifth year, what is wrong with just starting to vote on amendments?" said Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisc) to the Huffington Post. “That’s our job, we should be doing this.”
Already, the Senate rejected two other amendments. One would've classified any nuclear deal as an international treaty requiring the support of two-thirds of the Senate, while another would have denied Iran sanctions relief until it stopped supporting terrorism.
There is still time for some type of compromise deal regarding amendments to be reached, but according to the Huffington Post, time limits could also play a role in any decision to forgo further debate. The Senate is still poised to consider a highway infrastructure spending bill and another bill aimed at reforming the National Security Agency’s surveillance program. Both measures need to be acted on this month.