More lasers: Think tank urges Pentagon to invest in energy weapons
Published Tuesday by the Center for a New American Security, a think tank reportedly close to the current administration, a report titled ‘Directed-Energy Weapons: Promises and Prospects’ calls on the Department of Defense to drastically increase spending and unify research and development efforts for energy weapons.
The report notes that by 2022, China could overtake the US in terms of total research and development spending. However, this might provide an opportunity “to adopt, learn from, or otherwise tap into foreign scientific and technical developments, as a way to truncate lengthy and cumbersome weapon development processes."
“Directed-energy (DE) weapons, including high-energy lasers (HEL), high-power microwaves (HPM) and related radiofrequency technologies, offer the prospect of cost-effective precision attack or enhanced point defense and can provide warfighters with flexible non-kinetic employment options,” wrote Jason D. Ellis, a visiting senior fellow at CNAS.
— CNAS (@CNASdc) April 7, 2015
Currently, the US Navy operates a $40 million Laser Weapon System (LaWS), tested as a point-defense weapon against missiles, drones and boats. LaWS has been in use since August 2014, aboard the amphibious transport ship USS Ponce.
Though energy weapons have a “history of overpromise and underperformance,” Ellis wrote, the systems currently in development show promise. They are “not yet game-changers,” though.
He urged the Department of Defense (DOD) to create an “institutional strategy” to develop and field suitable energy weapon systems, and “empower, and hold accountable, a DOD champion” to manage the effort, in the form of a “joint directed-energy weapon program office.”
The report is a part of the ‘20YY Warfare Initiative’, a CNAS program described as an “ambitious, multi-year project to examine how emerging technologies will shape the future of warfare.”
Paul Scharre, the program’s director, noted that energy weapons held the promise of recapturing some of the technological advantages that have underwritten US military supremacy in the world.
After several decades and billions of dollars in investments, the Pentagon “has yet to successfully field an operational directed-energy weapon system,” Scharre wrote. “While megawatt-class lasers to shoot down ballistic missiles remain, for now, a distant prospect, today’s tactical lasers are potentially useful, cost-effective approaches for countering threats such as low-cost drones and small boats.”
To accomplish this, however, the Pentagon would have to spend more. Currently the DOD has budgeted roughly $405.3 million for DE weapons, just 36 percent of the 2007 spending (adjusted for inflation).
According to Ellis, “If DOD is to field operationally meaningful DE weapons, it should increase spending by two to three times for HEL and by five to 10 times for HPM,” or roughly half of the spending levels at the end of the Cold War.