icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm

Monsanto fined $600k by EPA for uncontrolled releases of toxic chemicals

Monsanto fined $600k by EPA for uncontrolled releases of toxic chemicals
Monsanto has agreed to pay the US government $600,000 for not reporting hundreds of uncontrolled toxic chemical releases from its Idaho phosphate plant. The releases in Soda Springs occurred between 2006 and 2009.

The plant emitted hydrogen cyanide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and mercury into the atmosphere during that three-year span, officials from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Justice Department said in a statement. Companies are required by law to report such releases immediately.

READ MORE: Monsanto lobbyist claims 'safe to drink a quart of pesticide' – but bolts when offered a glass (VIDEO)

"Each of these chemicals are hazardous and can pose serious health risks to workers and the community if mishandled or released in an uncontrolled manner," the federal statement said.

The Soda Springs facilities are operated by P4 Production LLC, a wholly owned Monsanto subsidiary. The company said it reconciled differences with the EPA, some as early as 2009, and received the EPA's violation notice in May 2011.

http://t.co/hKv0kze8sC tbh it's more newsworthy when the Monsanto plant in #SodaSprings#Idaho DOESN'T release dangerous chemicals. #idpol

— bən w¡lson (@beninboise) March 26, 2015

The company came into compliance by reporting the releases that continue to occur. But instead of reporting on a daily basis, Monsanto obtained a type of continuing release report, good for a year, according to Suzanne Powers, a compliance officer with the EPA, as reported by AP.

Monsanto said in a statement that none of the releases exceeded federal or state laws, and that the federal government was not accusing them of going beyond its standards.

"The protection of our employees, public health and the environment is always our No. 1 priority," said Roger Gibson, P4's vice president of operations. "As a long-time neighbor within the Soda Springs community, we care deeply about public health and the quality of our air, land and water, and we are committed to complying fully and transparently with all applicable laws and regulations."

READ MORE: Too ‘dramatic’: Monsanto shuns WHO verdict that Roundup ‘probably’ causes cancer

Several of the chemicals realeased in Soda Springs aren't considered priority pollutants, EPA spokesman Mark MacIntyre said.

“They fall through the crack a little bit in terms of the Clean Air Act and how they're regulated," Powers noted.

The southeastern Idaho plant has processed phosphate ore since 1952. Monsanto refines the ore mined by several companies. Phosphorus is used in the company’s Roundup herbicides, as well as in fire retardants and aviation fluids.

“Monsanto is committed to mining in an environmentally responsible and sensitive way. Soda Springs has and will continue to go above and beyond legal requirements for responsible mining,” the company said on its website. “We want to minimize environmental impacts, and we want to ensure the land is responsibly restored after mining has ceased. This includes planting flowers, grasses and shrubs, as well as constructing habitats to encourage wildlife to return to the land.”

In 2011, P4 agreed to pay a $1.4 million civil penalty for Clean Water Act violations at its South Rasmussen Mine near Soda Springs. In addition to the penalty, P4 said it would spend an estimated $875,000 on monitoring and to prevent pollutants from entering local waters.

The $600,000 fine is a slap on the wrist for a company that earned nearly $1.5 billion in profits during fiscal year 2013.

Dear readers and commenters,

We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system.

Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments,

RT Team.

Podcasts