‘Vile,’ ‘Disgraceful’: Outrage after Grenfell chairman requests cladding firm workers be exempt from criminal prosecutions
Sir Martin Moore-Bick has written to the Geoffrey Cox QC – the attorney general – requesting that any evidence submitted by individuals responsible for the refurbishment of the 24-story block will not be used to incriminate them. 72 residents perished in the Grenfell Tower fire in June 2017.
Moore-Bick warned that if witnesses do not gain immunity then “they will be considerably less candid than would otherwise have been the case as a result of trying to avoid saying anything that might harm their position in the future.”
🚨Grenfell Inquiry Breaking News🚨Sir Martin Moore-Bick will write to the Attorney General to recommend that he puts in place undertaking that nothing said by witnesses at inquiry can be used to further future criminal proceedings against them. See rationale below>> pic.twitter.com/2baeg2mVz5— Jack Simpson (@JSimpsonjourno) February 6, 2020
The move has infuriated many people online, with comments such as “disgraceful” and “vile” being attributed to the latest action undertaken in the second part of the inquiry – which has now been paused as a result.
Others branded the intervention as hypocritical and evidence of “double standards,” with the London Fire Brigade (LFB), including its former chief – Dany Cotton – having not sought “immunity” from any further criminal prosecutions against them.
Cotton resigned as commissioner of the LFB in December 2019 after receiving harsh criticism for her involvement in the tragedy. One person sarcastically tweeted: “Let’s blame the poor firemen and woman who actually went up the towering inferno.”
In simpler terms; when white people kill brownskinned people, the "law" let's them get away with itWhen brown skinned people kill white people, the full force of the "law" is applied pic.twitter.com/nxHEH5ow1N— Mahdi (@IslamMahdi_) February 6, 2020
The London Metropolitan Police is carrying out its own investigation into possible crimes, ranging from gross negligence manslaughter and corporate manslaughter to health and safety offences.
Part one of the inquiry – published in October 2019 – focused specifically on the events of the night in question and was highly critical of senior fire brigade officers. It concluded that calling off the fire service’s ‘stay-put’ strategy earlier could have saved lives.Also on rt.com Grenfell Tower fire errors: Fewer people would have died if fire service's ‘stay-put’ strategy had been called off
Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!
Subscribe to RT newsletter to get stories the mainstream media won’t tell you.