‘Bankers the real terrorists’: Occupy attacks London police for labeling protesters ‘extremists’
The presentation was given to nursery and primary school staff as part of an initiative dubbed Project Fawn, in which City of London police prepare schools for potential terrorist attacks on the UK.
In the slideshow, which was acquired by the Guardian following a Freedom of Information request, Occupy London is listed as an example of “domestic extremism” along with student and climate change protests.
Speaking to RT, Occupy London activists said the revelations show how serious a threat the demonstrations posed to the capitalist system.
The presentation covers threats to the UK by Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL), Al-Qaeda, lone gunmen and IRA terrorists and offers advice on dealing with bomb threats, hostile reconnaissance and screening mail.
It is also looks at left wing and right wing groups under the heading of domestic extremism. Left-wing groups considered to be extremist include the Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty group, climate change protesters, student demonstrators and Occupy London.
One slide titled ‘History in City of Terrorism and Domestic Issues’, features an image of the 2011-2012 Occupy London protests alongside photos of the 1997 Provisional IRA bombing of London’s docklands and the 7/7 bombings in 2005.
Janie Mac, an Occupier and construction worker, told RT the City of London regarded the protestors as extremists because they posed a serious threat to capitalism.
“This labelling and categorizing of democratic protesters shows how Occupy and the anarchist principles of mutual aid and non-hierarchy used scared the capitalist establishment of which the police are employed to protect,” she said.
“Not only were we labelled domestic extremists, companies such as Goldman Sachs were granted injunctions against us with no crime ever having been committed. Our freedoms of movement and our rights of association were compromised by this policing.”
“Make no mistake, the real terrorists threat to the UK is not a few people in tents, it is those at the top of the corporate and finance world who are creaming unimaginable personal wealth at the cost of creating a horrific future for humanity,” she added.
Matthew Varnham, director of human rights organization Legal Observers, told RT the sheer cost of policing recent democratic protests suggests the authorities continue to treat legitimate dissent as a serious threat.
The Metropolitan Police spent £1.9 million (US$2.96 million) policing demonstrations outside Parliament from mid-October 2014 to mid-February 2015, according to figures retrieved by London Assembly Member Baroness Jenny Jones.
“Based on the basic officer salary being at £19,386 working 233 days per year this means, per day, policing the square could have paid for 1,354 police officers,” Varnham said.
At the height of the global Occupy protests in December 2011 the City of London police included a detailed account of Occupy London activists on a ‘Terrorism/extremism update’ sent out to ‘trusted partners’ in the area.
One document, dated December 2, encourages the business community to report suspicious behavior to the police.
“As the worldwide Occupy movement shows no sign of abating, it is likely that activists aspire to identify other locations to occupy, especially those they identify with capitalism,” it states.
“All are asked to be vigilant regarding suspected reconnaissance, particularly around empty buildings.”
After the documents were leaked to the press, City of London police apologized to a member of Occupy London.
In an email passed to RT by Varnham, a senior police officer stated the suggestion Occupy London was a terrorist organization was a “mistake.”
“To reiterate, it was never our intention to suggest that we view the Occupy Movement as being terrorist or extremist in nature,” Staff Officer to the Commissioner Darren Pulman said in the email.
“Indeed, the force has worked hard to liaise with protestors, as well as local businesses and the Cathedral, to facilitate peaceful protest and minimize disruption to the local community.”
Pulman provided a link to an apology which was posted on the police force’s website. The link is no longer working and the page appears to have been taken down.