icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm
14 May, 2015 10:56

Too ‘aggressive’ to lead UKIP? Farage facing leadership rebellion

Too ‘aggressive’ to lead UKIP? Farage facing leadership rebellion

After damaging claims concerning the UKIP leader’s credibility appeared in the Times on Thursday, Nigel Farage is facing further calls to step down.

The latest calls come from the biggest UKIP party donor Stuart Wheeler who told the BBC on Thursday he thinks Farage is “too aggressive” and “divisive” to successfully lead the party through an EU referendum.

His comments come after UKIP’s general election campaign director said Nigel Farage is transforming the party into his own cult of personality, saying the leader was “snarling, thin-skinned and aggressive.

Patrick O’Flynn, UKIP MEP for the East of England, is the first in the party to hint at factional divisions which have emerged in the wake of the general election, with the party’s only MP Douglas Carswell pitted against Farage in a squabble over funds.

Wheeler said: “Personally I would not want him to be the leader now.”

“I don’t think the way he resumed his leadership was done in the right way. And I think in the crucial in/out referendum, which it looks as if we’re going to get, I think that all the people who voted UKIP in the election will vote to leave the EU.

“A rather quieter approach would be a better method than the method by which he’s become so well-known and popular, which is highly effective, but I think it’s now time for something quieter,” he added.

His comments come after O’Flynn further criticized “inexperienced” aides who he said needed to be replaced, and said that the current leadership system in the party needed to be more consultative and consensual, to avoid appearing like an “absolute monarchy.”

READ MORE: Election fraud allegations probed in Nigel Farage’s South Thanet campaign

Some party members, however, see O’Flynn’s public criticism as a means of interference. One senior UKIP source said on Wednesday they were unsure whether he was “behaving in a manner befitting a professional political party.”

Two leading figures in the party, Farage and Carswell, are currently embroiled in a row over the £650,000 public funding UKIP receives as a party of opposition.

Carswell, UKIP’s sole MP and Tory defector, said it would be “completely inappropriate” for him to use the funds to hire 15 members of staff for his office, and has suggested he choose how best to use the money.

The two men did not resolve the conflict at a meeting on Wednesday.

O’Flynn said that since the election Farage had behaved poorly as a leader.

“What’s happened since Thursday night, Friday morning has certainly laid us open to the charge that this looks like an absolutist monarchy or a personality cult,” he said. “I don’t think that even Nigel would say it’s been the most glorious chapter of his leadership.

“The team around Nigel himself need to reflect why it was that Thanet voted in a UKIP council but didn’t vote in Nigel as the MP for Thanet South,” he added.

READ MORE: UKIP/Green pact? Bennett doesn’t rule electoral reform collaboration

There has been speculation that Carswell may even leave the party after the money row.

A spokesperson said the negotiations were ongoing.

“Nigel Farage met with Douglas Carswell this afternoon and there’s ongoing discussion about how best to represent four million UKIP voters in a way that is sensible and correct.”

Should he decide to leave the party, he will lose the £650,000.

Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Today program on Wednesday, Carswell said: “There are one or two rather excitable staffers in UKIP who came up with a proposal that involved hiring 15 extra people.

I mean, I’m not an American senator. I doubt that even Ed Miliband when he was leader of the opposition would have had 15 staff in his office.

“UKIP is meant to be different and UKIP is going to be different. And I think we need to make it absolutely clear that when we spend money, we are doing it because it is the right thing to do, not just simply because the money’s there,” he added.