icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm

​U-drones: Britain to spend £17mn on unmanned underwater vehicles

​U-drones: Britain to spend £17mn on unmanned underwater vehicles
The UK Ministry of Defense will spend £17 million on a fleet of sea drones after signing a contract with French arms giant Thales.

The drones will be developed with the MoD’s French counterpart, the Direction Générale de l’Armement (DGA). The MoD claims the vehicles will be used mainly for mine clearance.

The initiative aims to develop two kinds of unmanned maritime vehicle – a submarine and a surface craft – to meet the operational criteria of both nations.

While headed by Thales, the consortium which will work on the project includes British defense firm BAE.

Philip Dunne, a UK defense minister, said: “The development of unmanned maritime systems is a new and exciting area for both the UK and France.

READ MORE: Heli-flop-ter: Britain mothballs costly Apache helicopters after brief Afghan, Libyan service

By working together and drawing on a common vision for unmanned underwater systems, we will be able to explore the military, technological, financial and skills benefits that developing this maritime capability could bring.

This work also feeds into the Government’s Defense Growth Partnership, aimed at ensuring the UK’s Defense Sector grows in the future by strengthening our global center of excellence and inspiring the next generation.

Head of UK Defense Materials, Bernard Gray, said: “Both the UK and France recognize the potential for unmanned vehicles to counter the threat of sea-mines.

Both nations are committed to developing a prototype for the Maritime Mine Counter Measures demonstrator to test the feasibility of using remotely operated, unmanned marine vehicles and sensors to detect and dispose of this threat to our maritime capability.

It is not clear whether the new systems will augment or replace the Royal Navy’s existing fleet of 18 Seafox Unmanned Underwater Vehicles (UUVs) based at Whale Island, Portsmouth, which have seen service in the Straits of Hormuz.

With a particular focus on the drones’ anti-mine role, there is little mention of the technology’s offensive capabilities, as demonstrated by Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in Afghanistan.

However a report by the Defense Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTL) seen by the Guardian newspaper in 2012 does touch on the combat potential of maritime drones.

In the report, formerly head of the MoD's development, concepts and doctrine center Rear Admiral Chris Parry said: “The whole area of UUVs is about to explode … it could be as big in the maritime sector as it is in airspace.

They could be used for clearing mines for a nuclear submarine, or the covert mapping of important harbors. A UUV could find a submarine, attach itself to it and then explode … there is no limit to what could be done.

Speaking to RT, Jordan Jones, 28, who served as a non-commissioned Royal Navy warfare specialist on frigates and destroyers between 2007 and 2011, said he found it incredible there was always money to be found for new military innovations.

READ MORE: MoD splashes out on £500k-a-year boss despite military spending cuts

Yet there's never enough for investing in public services, social security and even keeping wages afloat,” he said. “Seventeen million pounds for a program which, like most genius ideas Thales and BAE come up with, get p*ssed up the wall and become 30 million, 40 million, 50 million plus.

Jones was skeptical of claims that the role of sea drones would be limited to mine clearance operations.

I'm cautious about believing that this program is only catering towards ‘defensive’ situations. I think, once the tech is in place that an excuse will be made, or not, for using it for more aggressive purposes.