icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm
17 Feb, 2015 16:38

​Supreme Court to rule on segregation of jailed terrorists in human rights bid

​Supreme Court to rule on segregation of jailed terrorists in human rights bid

Two convicted terrorist who claim their human rights have been violated after being segregated in prison have taken their legal battle to Britain’s highest court, after failing to persuade appeal judges.

Both jailed Islamists have taken their cases to Britain’s Supreme Court, complaining about their separation from other inmates.

Algerian Kamel Bourgass, 35, who murdered a police officer and planned to carry out ricin poison attacks, and “liquid bomber” Tanvir Hussain, 31, are both serving life in separate prisons.

They were each subject to six months segregation in 2010 after attacking inmates. Guards said the measure was necessary for “discipline and good order.”

According to the prison service, Hussain was segregated after he committed a serious assault on a prisoner in a cell. He also reportedly preached extremist Islamic ideology through his cell window, the Independent reports.

Both men deny the accusations.

The terrorists’ lawyers told the court the two men were left alone in their cells for 23 hours a day, which has led to “feelings of hopelessness and depression.”

Dinah Rose QC argued that “in the circumstances” the decisions to segregate them and to continue that segregation were “unlawful.”

“In neither case was there sufficient evidence to bring criminal charges or sustain internal prison disciplinary charges against them,” she told the court.

READ MORE:1 terror suspect arrested every day, says UK police commissioner

Five Supreme Court judges in London are being asked to rule on the case, following a ruling from March 2012 when the two men failed to convince appeal judges their treatment was unlawful.

In February 2011, a High Court judge said segregation didn’t breach their common law rights or their rights under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights to fair treatment.

Bourgass is serving 17 years for conspiracy to commit public nuisance by using poisons or explosives in relation to the 2002 Ricin terrorist plot.

He is also serving a life sentence for murdering DC Stephen Oake, 40, with a kitchen knife during his 2003 arrest at a flat in Manchester, in which he also injured four other officers.

In connection with this, Bourgass is also serving sentences for the attempted murder of two officers and wounding a third.

READ MORE:Trial of terror suspect who ‘planned Woolwich-style murder of soldier’ begins

Hussain was one of three men convicted of a plot to launch suicide attacks on flights bound for America and Canada from London Heathrow using liquid bombs made of hydrogen peroxide hidden in soft drink bottles. He is serving life with a minimum of 32 years.

The legal challenge has been criticized by many.

Conservative MP Peter Bone told the Express: “The European Convention on Human Rights was not introduced for murderers who attack other inmates and try to spread poison in prison. It’s totally and utterly wrong.”