icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm
9 Feb, 2015 17:09

Iraq War foreign secretary could be peer before Chilcot report published

Iraq War foreign secretary could be peer before Chilcot report published

Tony Blair’s foreign secretary, who held office during the 2003 invasion of Iraq, is being lined up for a seat in the House of Lords. He could be granted the accolade before the results of the Chilcot Inquiry into the legality of the war are published.

Jack Straw may be offered a place in the Lords after he steps down as an MP in May, and he is understood to be open to the idea of a peerage.

One senior Labour source told the MailOnline that Straw was “on his way down the corridor to the other place,” but if he accepts an offer, he could be made a peer before the highly anticipated results of the investigation into the invasion of Iraq are released.

The Chairman of the inquiry, Sir John Chilcot, faced a cross-party committee last week to explain the ivestigation’s four-year delay, which last took evidence from a witness in 2011 and is reportedly nearly one million words long.

READ MORE:Iraq inquiry chairman grilled by MPs over report delay

Straw, who was foreign secretary between 2001 and 2006, is expected to face heavy criticism when the report is finally published, with sources saying he is one of around 30 people to receive letters warning them of hostile content.

Downing Street insiders say the report is likely to be a “devastating” indictment for the Blair government and members of the Whitehall establishment.

Straw has previously said rumors that witnesses are responsible for the continuing delays to publication were “wholly without foundation” and insisted it was in the best interest of MPs to see the results of the inquiry as soon as possible.

He is reported to have expressed “deep regret” about the war during his evidence sessions, and said he took the decision to invade “very reluctantly.”

READ MORE:‘Laughing stock of the world’: MPs debate Iraq Inquiry delay

Speaking before Parliament last week, Chilcot refused to say exactly how many people had been criticized in the report, saying “at the risk of being obdurate, I mustn't. If I start to give numbers people can work out who might be involved.”

He said he would deliver the report “as soon as we possibly can,” but said he would not rush the process of ‘Maxwellisation’ – the opportunity for criticized parties to respond – to speed up publication.

Chilcot further added he had accepted the summons to Parliament due to the “exceptionally high level of parliamentary and public interest in our progress.”

There has been widespread public frustration at the delays to the report, but Chilcot confirmed it would not be released until after the general election in May.