icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm

Russian human rights chief set to gain greater powers

Russian human rights chief set to gain greater powers
Russia’s Justice Ministry has drafted a package of bills which would enable the official human rights commissioner to defend not only the rights of individuals but of the Russian people as a whole.

Under the amendments, the ombudsmen – the position currently held by Vladimir Lukin – would be able to file complaints on behalf of “an undefined group of people” to represent in court their lawful rights, freedoms and interests. Ironically enough, according to the existing law, the right to file such suits presently applies to almost everyone except the human rights commissioner. It includes the federal and local government bodies, organizations and citizens themselves. However, people are not used to defending their rights in court, feeling general distrust towards the court system as a whole. The new law would see citizens who have somehow suffered from the authorities being able to delegate interaction with official bodies to the human rights commissioner. The ombudsman himself will also have the right to turn to court if he gets to know about “mass or severe violations of citizens’ rights and freedoms in cases of particular public importance”, the draft bill says. In addition, the ombudsman would be allowed to file demands to recognize any legal act issued by a government body of any level as partially or fully contradicting the law. He would not have to legally substantiate the complaint. His statement that he has registered a case of mass violation of human rights would be enough to launch a civil case. The ombudsman would continue work on cases of individual human rights violations and in this domain he would see his powers extended too. For example, he would be able to intervene in a case in court in the first instance giving his opinion on the matter which should be taken as weighty evidence by the judge.

Dear readers and commenters,

We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system.

Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments,

RT Team.