icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm

Georgian Supreme Court sides with opposition over law on public gathering case

Georgian Supreme Court sides with opposition over law on public gathering case
Georgia’s Constitutional Court has ruled that a number of norms in the Law on Gatherings and Manifestations as well as the Administrative Code contradict the country’s constitution which guarantees the freedom of speech, assembly and manifestation.

The decision was taken by the Constitutional Court on Monday in favor of several politicians and public figures now in opposition to President Mikhail Saakashvili. They are the People’s Defender (or ombudsman) of Georgia Georgiy Tugushi, the non-government organization Association of Young Lawyers of Georgia, the Movement for United Georgia and the Conservative Party. Several people participated in the lawsuit as private persons.   The lawsuit deals with the bills on “Gatherings and Manifestations”, “Police” and “Administrative Code” that were approved by the Georgian parliament in 2009. The lawsuit against the bills was filed in 2010, but the court procedures lingered until this year. The court found unconstitutional the paragraphs that forbid demonstrations to be held near offices of certain state organizations, including court buildings. The court also found that in some cases the norm de-facto forbade gatherings as such. At the same time, the court ruled that the state can limit the right for free assembly if security interests call for it. The court also ruled that the norm forbidding some citizens to be initiators of rallies was against the constitution as was the norm that forbids people without Georgian citizenship to organize any political actions and even claim responsibility for them. The court, however, recognized as complying with the constitution the norm that forbids blocking roads and obliges participants of the action to stop if at any point the law is violated. The court also supported the norm that forbids calling for the violent overthrow of the current political regime and the norm that forbids the officers of the Investigation Service of the Finance Ministry to hold any rallies or manifestations.  The move was welcomed by Georgia’s ombudsman, Georgiy Kudushi, who has called the decision of the Constitutional Court “a significant step forward.”

Dear readers and commenters,

We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system.

Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments,

RT Team.