Manchester Arena attack: ‘We caused bloody chaos, not surprising there’s blowback’
Manchester police have confirmed the attack at Manchester Arena on Monday night was carried out by one person using an improvised explosive device. At least 22 people, including children, have been killed by the attack at a concert by American singer Ariana Grande. Over 50 others were injured.
The threat level in the UK is regarded as 'severe' which means another attack is highly likely.
‘We need to think about our foreign policy'
Independent journalist Robert Harneis compared the incident in Manchester with the November 2015 attacks in Paris by Islamist militants on the Bataclan concert hall and other sites in the city.
“This is a similar attack on a soft target,” he said.
In his view, terrorist attacks have become “a new norm” for European countries because of “what they do” as part of their foreign policies.
“We need to be realistic: we go into the Middle East and North Africa and attack other people…We go to these countries, and we cause bloody chaos. It is not very surprising that there is blowback. We have to sit down and think about what our foreign policy is; why we are in these countries; is it necessary for us to be involved in all this mayhem in Syria and Libya, in Iraq and Afghanistan, and so on,” Harneis said.
The attack on Manchester happened on the fourth anniversary of the murder of Lee Rigby, a British soldier killed by two Islamist extremists in southeast London. Is there a possible connection here?
“These attacks tend to have those sort of links that are clearly intended to be symbolic. It can be a coincidence, but I don’t think so,” Harneis added.
Adam Garrie, the managing editor at the Duran media platform, said that modern concert and sporting arenas in countries like the UK have a lot of security, including the bag checks, scanners.
“To put it into perspective it is difficult to sneak in a large pizza box that wasn’t purchased inside the arena. Are we really living in a situation, where it is easier to sneak in a bomb than a pizza..? Questions need to be asked.”
Political commentator and journalist John Wight, argues that despite efforts by security and intelligence it’s impossible to stop all terrorist attacks.
“That is the reality. We live in open societies. Some of these attacks will, unfortunately, get through despite the extraordinary efforts of security and intelligence agencies throughout the world. Every intelligence agency is committed, regardless of the country, to intercepting and stopping these attacks before they can take place. They are successful in many instances in doing so. Unfortunately, they cannot be successful in every instance given the regularity and given the ubiquity of the fanaticism and the extremism in the world today emanating from the Middle East and events there,” Wight told RT.
Beirut-based British journalist Martin Jay agrees such attacks are inevitable.
“There is a real crisis, isn’t it, both at the EU level and on a national level for many EU member states. When we talk about security and data sharing, intelligence sharing and border security, the EU is way behind; it is just can't get the agreement on the member-state level with some of these various drafts that are currently going through the Brussels mill,” he said. “Tragically this sort of attacks is inevitable. If you look just at the Paris attack – it was another good example of EU rules failing. The actual Paris attacker arrived and crossed an EU border, was scrutinized by EU border security official, who even identified he had a fake Syrian ID, but ultimately let him in after a week in custody. The similar tragic story was with them in Brussels,” he told RT.
He also noted that terrorists in the UK seem to pick symbolic places to carry out atrocities - like Parliament in March, or a teen concert now in Manchester. Jay said that’s part of “a sick twisted ideology behind these attacks” is to get maximum publicity.
Who’s to blame?
US President Donald Trump called the perpetrators of the Manchester attack “evil losers.” According to Middle East expert Ammar Waqqaf, that’s an attempt to avoid responsibility and lay the blame on someone else.
“This reflects a sense of denial that the West in general, that the US and every single state that stepped in to actively destabilize countries in the Middle East like Libya and Syria. They are trying to hide away from responsibility basically,” he told RT. “We’ve never heard about Libyans blowing up themselves during the Gaddafi era, or when Syria was stable. There were no Syrians doing these things. To say they are ‘losers’ – this is about attacking them, attacking their ideology; attacking whatever and trying to lay the blame on someone else. These countries: [the US], the UK, France, whoever got involved whether willingly or dragged into it, by opportunity or by pressure from regional allies – to try and destabilize these countries should realize that destabilizing such countries is the main reason for all this mayhem that we see and injustice that a lot of people feel.”
Waqqaf also drew an example from what is happening within British society.
“We understand that there is a lot of tension between Muslims now in Britain based on the narrative they hear from the news. There is a bit of friction between Sunni communities and Shia communities. They believe from what they hear is that there is a Sunny-Shia war in the region, and they are taking sides and becoming very extremely partisan, and that is not healthy at all,” the expert said.
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.