Reports of massive chemical attack near Damascus as UN observers arrive in Syria
(WARNING: THE ARTICLE CONTAINS GRAPHIC PHOTOS)
Initially, Al-Arabiya posted news of 280 victims on Twitter.
Later, the news outlet upgraded the figure up to 1,188 victims
quoting the Free Syrian Army.
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights had a much lower figure,
claiming dozens of people were killed, including children.
News agencies such as Reuters and AP mostly put the numbers of
victims at hundreds, but say that reports can't be independently
BREAKING: Syrian opposition groups claim over 100 killed near capital in alleged toxic gas attack.— The Associated Press (@AP) August 21, 2013
#BREAKING Syria opposition says 1,300 killed in chemical attack— Agence France-Presse (@AFP) August 21, 2013
George Sabra, the president of the Syrian National Council –
Syria’s main opposition group – claimed that some 1,300 people
were killed in government forces attacks near Damascus on
Wednesday, and alleged that chemical weapons were used.
Speaking at a news conference in Istanbul, Sabra also claimed it was “not the first time the regime has used chemical weapons.” He added that he considered the Wednesday attack a “turning point” in Assad’s military operations, alleging that the chemical were used “for annihilation rather than terror.”
Meanwhile, an RT Arabic correspondent managed to contact some
locals who say they haven't witnessed any “poisonous
attack” in the area. However, they point out that gunfire can
Syrian authorities issued a statement saying there is “no truth whatsoever” to reports of chemical weapons use near Damascus.
The incident reportedly took place in Ghouta, on the green agricultural belt territory surrounding the Syrian capital.
The Ghouta region on the outskirts of Damascus is known for its opposition inclinations and has been the site of past clashes between government forces and the rebels.
“Jabhat al-Nusra has had a long-time presence there and the
region has borne the brunt of sustained military pressure for
months now," Charles Lister, an analyst at IHS Jane's
Terrorism and Insurgency Center, told Reuters, referring to a
hardline Sunni Islamist rebel group allied to al-Qaeda.
The European Union has called for a "thorough and immediate" investigation of an alleged chemical attack in Syria.
"We have seen with grave concern the reports of the possible use of chemical weapons by the Syrian regime. Such accusations should be immediately and thoroughly investigated," said EU foreign policy spokesman, Catherine Ashton.
"The EU reiterates that any use of chemical weapons, by any
side in Syria, would be totally unacceptable."
The UN Security Council (UNSC) said that conflicting reports of a chemical weapons attack in Syria need to be investigated, adding that such claims represent a “serious escalation with grave humanitarian consequences.”
The news emerged on the day UN inspectors arrive in Damascus to examine suspected cases of chemical weapons use in the war-torn country.
The UN expert and the head of the current mission to Damascus,
Swedish scientist Ake Sellstrom, told news agency TT that while
he had only seen TV footage, the high number of casualties
reported sounded suspicious.
"It sounds like something that should be looked into," he told TT by phone. "It will depend on whether any UN member state goes to the secretary-general and says we should look at this event. We are in place."
He said that the high numbers of killed and wounded being reported are "suspicious."
Among those who also voiced their concern are the Arab league spokesman and UK foreign secretary William Hague.
However, the Assad government denied there had been any use of chemical weapons. Dr. Abdulqader Azouz told RT’s Arabic channel Rossiya al-Yaum the Syrian army was “winning the battle against the rebels” and there was no need for chemical weapons.
“America has always put the pretext of using chemical weapons on the top of its agenda as a means of intervention in Syria,” Azouz told Rossiya al-Yaum. He went on to stress that the Syrian government has pledged “its commitment to full cooperation with the investigation committee and other specialized committees.”
Media reports about Syrian government troops using chemical weapons near Damascus are aimed at misleading international observers, the Syrian ambassador in Russia, Riyadh Haddad told Interfax.
“It’s not true,” he stressed.
Videos of attack aftermath emerge
Several videos showing alleged victims of the attack emerged online. The footage shows people lying on the ground, moaning and shouting, with some of them unconscious. One of the videos shows a man shivering violently while lying on the ground, as though he has a fever. Another piece of footage shows a grief-stricken father whose daughters were apparently killed in the attack.
Some footage allegedly showing the aftermath of the attack has
been compiled by Reddit.com news portal.
Meanwhile, Syrian state news outlet Sana reported there had been strikes on rebel strongholds in the area which “demolished a number of terrorists' hideouts, leaving many of them dead and injured.”
Sana said there had been strikes in the villages of Jouber, Erbin and Zamalka in Damascus Countryside.
Weeks ago, the United Nations pointed out that an agreement had been reached with Assad’s government as to the three locations that UN inspectors would be examining, with the mission led by Swedish scientist, Ake Sellstrom.
The UN received some 13 reports of alleged use of chemical
weapons in Syria and the UN inspectors will be investigating the
“allegations” of chemical weapons use, rather than
determining who was behind the attacks.
In July, Russia submitted to the UN its analysis of samples taken
west of Aleppo. Russia’s findings indicated that it was rebels
behind the Khan al-Assal incident, in which more than 30 people
The US contradicted the Russian findings, stressing they had their own data which proved that the government forces were behind the attack. However, Paulo Pinheiro, chairman of the UN commission’s inquiry into rights violations in Syria, said the evidence provided by the US did not meet required standards.
The Obama administration repeatedly called the use of chemical weapons in Syria “a red line.”