Ousted Kyrgyz president leaves country, resigns from post
Earlier, the president’s closest supporters denied Bakiyev’s resignation. However, a spokesperson for the interim government stated that the letter was delivered Friday morning by a special messenger at the OSCE in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan’s capital.
“I resign, in accordance with Article 50 of the Constitution of the Republic of Kyrgyzstan, fully realizing the responsibility for the future of the Kyrgyz people, the preservation of statehood and the Kyrgyz nationality, during these tragic days,” Bakiyev’s letter read.
Bakiyev left Kyrgyzstan on Thursday, following permission from the interim government.
“During the last days, the former president, ousted by the people’s will, surrounded himself with relatives, among whom there are many women and children, in his native village and became a source of destabilization in the Dzhalal-Abad region,” a statement issued by the interim government read. “Having hidden behind the human shield – in fact, having taken his relatives and all villages’ residents hostage – he organized an active campaign aimed at justifying himself, trying to provoke a civil confrontation between the north and south of the country.”
He arrived at Kazakhstan’s Taraz airport on Thursday. Reports have been circulating that Bakiyev was soon planning to relocate again, but there has been no official confirmation.
In the meantime, the Kyrgyz authorities are continuing the search for the deposed president’s relatives. The interim government has promised the people of Kyrgyzstan to bring to justice Bakiyev’s brother, who was in charge of state security forces that opened fire on anti-government demonstrators, and Bakiyev’s son, who has been accused of misappropriating government funds.
International perspective on the events
Kurmanbek Bakiyev has left Kyrgyz territory as a result of an agreement between the presidents of Kazakhstan, Russia, US and a number of international organizations, announced Kazakh Foreign Minister and Chairman of the Organization of Security and Cooperation in Europe Kanat Saudabayev.
“On April 15, as a result of common efforts of Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbayev, US President Barack Obama, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and active mediation of the OSCE an agreement has been achieved between the interim government of Kyrgyzstan and president Kurmanbek Bakiyev about the latter’s departure from the country,” reads the statement by OSCE chairman Kanat Saudabayev.
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has said the recent violence in Kyrgyzstan is the result of Bakiyev’s policies:
“This is a really dramatic situation for Kyrgyzstan because we have seen it all before. And it is not because someone wants a revolution, but because the Kyrgyz people have not been satisfied with their lives for the past few years. Unfortunately Bakiyev could not solve the country’s social and economic problems,” Medvedev said.
“Moreover, the collapse of the existing political system happened because he has not solved these problems – and his regime was based on nepotism,” he added.
On Thursday, Russia’s president discussed the situation in Kyrgyzstan in a phone call with his Kazakh counterpart, Nursultan Nazarbaev, said Medvedev’s press-secretary.
“Nazarbaev has informed Medvedev about Kazakhstan’s efforts to regulate the situation in Kyrgyzstan and about his contacts with representatives of the interim government,” the spokesperson added.
“Medvedev has instructed the Russian Defense Ministry to guarantee a safe flight to Kazakhstan for ousted President Bakiyev with his family,” she said.
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has also said that future relations between Russia and Kyrgyzstan will depend on the true will of the Kyrgyz people and ability of the current government to maintain order and security as well as to address urgent social and economic issues, according to the President’s press secretary, Natalia Timakova.
Medvedev added that much will depend on whether the interim government will be able to hold open and just elections.
The President believes that “Bakiev’s regime fiasco was provoked by his inability to maintain proper social and economic development of Kyrgyzstan, to take into account the people’s interests, and also by the corruption and nepotism of recent years.”
Bakiyev's farewell meeting with supporters
Earlier on Thursday, Bakiyev informed his supporters that Kazakh president Nursultan Nazarbayev has invited him to talk about regulating of the situation in Kyrgyzstan.
Before he left, Bakiyev met with his followers in his father’s house in a suburb of Dzhalal-Abad. Some 500 people were outraged by the news of his departure and did not want to let Bakiyev go, RIA Novosti reports.
People yelled that if anything happens to Bakiyev, there will be a lot of blood, according to RIA Novosti.
“I’m going there to tell my opinion,” the ousted president was quoted as saying. “Let them listen to me, because everybody got very confused; nobody is presenting my opinion.”
Bakiyev’s supporters have promised to meet him back in Dzhalal-Abad.Bakiyev also confirmed that a representative of the Kyrgyz interim government has met with him and “more or less official talks have already begun.”
Kurmanbek Bakiyev has run out of time, declared the leader of the interim government Rosa Otunbayeva on Thursday.
“We are not accepting any conditions from [Bakiyev], except for providing security,” she emphasized.
Experts on Bakiyev's departure
Asher Pirt, an expert on Central Asian affairs, says ousted President Bakiyev is likely afraid that he may face trial on corruption charges.
“He is still going to be responsible for what happened. Now it’s up to interim leader Otunbaeva to decide what is going to happen next,” Pirt told RT. “A lot of post-Soviet leaders, when they leave power, they often have an agreement with a previous leader that if they committed any crimes… while they were in power, they will be immune from those sort of allegations. So I think he is still worried about what might happen.”
Andrew Osborn, the Daily Telegraph's Moscow bureau chief says that most probably big powers pressed or convinced Bakiyev to leave the country.
“The big powers have an interest in his country. Namely Russia, the United States and China, I think were all involved behind the scenes in this. And I think that their role was really crucial in persuading [Kurmanbek Bakiyev] to leave peacefully. So it was their pressure that really [took a toll] on him and he simply realized that the game was up,” Osborn believes.
A former OSCE election observer in Kyrgyzstan, Andy McEntee, sees the roots of the Kyrgyz uprising in the 2009 election.
“There has been discontent in Kyrgyzstan from the early days of the Bakiyev government, which is now five years old,” McEntee told RT. “Certainly by the time of the election last summer, it was expected to be mass fraud across the country, and it was. I saw it, it was undisputable. In some towns the opposition candidates won with a clear majority, but in the following morning he'd lose massively. And the people knew it.”
Journalist Sergey Strokan from the Kommersant newspaper praised Moscow’s position on the Kyrgyz issue.
“Moscow adopted a fairly reasonable position,” Strokan told RT. “Its basic principle was that this is an internal matter, which should be decided within the Kyrgyz political elite without any interference. At the same time, Moscow hinted that it is ready to provide any assistance to an interim Kyrgyz government.”
Aleksandr Knyazev, director of the Commonwealth of Independent States Institute in Bishkek, says the interim government needs to bring the ousted President to trial in order to win public support.
“It's good that Bakiyev has left the country because it prevents the possibility of an armed military conflict,” Knyazev told RT. “There was such a danger. Now the interim government will have to do its best to pacify public opinion and show it will try hard to bring him to court. The interim government is taking steps to get control of the property belonging to Bakiyev and his circle. Change in public opinion will also depend on the outcome of the effort to nationalize the misappropriated assets. People must see some justice restored.”
Lilit Gevorgyan from IHS Global Insight believes there are quite a number of things that the new government has to tackle.
“To summarize, it’s a new page in the political development of Kyrgyzstan,” Gevorgyan told RT. “First of all, the interim government has to regain control over the country. The second thing is to set up new elections. There is a large to-do list; it’s quite long. The first thing that they need to do is to make sure that there are free and fair elections, and they need to stabilize the economy, they need to deconstruct the oligarchic structure that Bakiyev built around himself and his family.”
Restoring normality in Kyrgyzstan will not be an easy process, believes Evgeny Volk from the Yeltsin Fund – the political system is corrupt all through.
“Of course, the new government will put its people to key posts, the people who worked with Bakiyev will be dismissed,” the political analyst said.
“But in fact this can hardly change the situation in Kyrgyzstan because the real prerequisite is the rule of law, fighting the corruption and establishing a basis for democracy – which is a long-term process which may take a lot of time if the present government has sufficient political will to follow the path of democracy and freedom.”
Read more on this topic – Kyrgyz president leaves country for neighbouring Kazakhstan