icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm
19 Jan, 2023 22:54

‘Grave assault’ on US judiciary goes unpunished

Investigators were “unable to identify” the culprit who leaked the draft of the Dobbs decision to Politico
‘Grave assault’ on US judiciary goes unpunished

After months of investigating who may have leaked the draft of a verdict that reversed decades of precedent on abortion, the US Supreme Court announced on Thursday that the culprit could not be found.

Politico published the entire draft of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision on May 2 last year, revealing that the court was preparing to overturn the precedent sent by 1973’s Roe v. Wade.

In Thursday’s statement, the court described the leak as “one of the worst breaches of trust in its history” and “a grave assault on the judicial process,” adding that exposing internal deliberations threatened the integrity of its proceedings.

The marshal of the court was tasked with discovering the leaker and began working within days. A team of “seasoned attorneys and trained federal investigators with substantial experience conducting criminal, administrative and cyber investigations” interviewed 97 Supreme Court employees, but were “unable to determine” the identity of the leaker, the Marshal of the Supreme Court said in her report. The probe did conclude it was unlikely that the court’s computers were accessed from the outside, however, and recommended a series of measures to prevent future leaks.

In addition to the marshal’s probe, Chief Justice John Roberts reached out to former Homeland Security secretary Michael Chertoff to “independently review and assess” the investigation. Chertoff declared that the probe was “thorough” and that he could not think of “any additional useful investigative measures.”

Chertoff headed the DHS during President George W. Bush’s second term, and was a federal judge and prosecutor prior to that. He currently sits on the advisory board of Norm Eisen’s States United Democracy Center, a nonprofit seeking to “safeguard democracy” by “advancing free, fair, and secure elections.”

The publication of the Dobbs draft was a political bombshell. Republicans and Democrats traded accusations as to who leaked the document and why. Pro-abortion activists protested outside conservative-leaning justices’ homes and even made death threats. The White House reacted to the leak by calling on Americans to vote for Democrats in the upcoming midterm elections, with the party fundraising off the controversy. The court went ahead and overturned Roe in June.

Podcasts
0:00
25:58
0:00
25:39