‘Never happened’: Aussie SAS corporal denies claims he ‘BLOODED’ rookie soldier by ordering him to kill prisoners
Former SAS corporal Ben Roberts-Smith has firmly rejected allegations he ever killed unarmed detainees in Afghanistan, as well as claims he ordered a rookie to kill unarmed Afghan men in a “blooding” ritual.
The new round of hearings in the defamation case launched by Roberts-Smith, one of Australia’s most-decorated living war veterans, against news outlets that exposed his alleged war crimes, took place at Sydney Federal Court on Friday.
The hearings did not exactly go smoothly for Roberts-Smith, with the former soldier pelted by the defense barrister, Nicholas Owens, with assorted uncomfortable questions about his time in Afghanistan. Some of the questions were related to an incident that took place on September 11, 2009, when Roberts-Smith’s unit was deployed to the small village of Darwan, in Afghanistan’s Uruzgan province.Also on rt.com Trial of the century will reveal EXACTLY what Australian soldiers really got up to in Afghanistan
According to Roberts-Smith’s account, an Afghan man, identified as Ali Jan, was killed while hiding in a cornfield and acting as a spotter for the Taliban. The defense, however, alleged the man was actually detained – and then brutally killed by the plaintiff, who kicked him off of a cliff. The former corporal denied the accusation, as well as claims that he colluded with two soldiers to cover up the killing.
He even disputed whether there was a cliff in Darwan high enough to kill someone in this way. He said it was “very steep terrain. If it was a cliff you couldn’t walk down it.”
“In Afghanistan, things are steep everywhere,” he stated. Presented with photos of the area where the incident allegedly took place, Roberts-Smith laughed when he was asked if he recognized it, Australian media reported.
Roberts-Smith was also grilled on a separate incident, in which he allegedly interrogated, detained, and restrained an Afghan man, punching the victim in the process and ultimately shooting him dead.
“He was wearing flexi-cuffs when he was shot wasn’t he?” Owens asked. “You interrogated three men you had found for more than an hour, assaulted those men, eventually killed one of those men?”
The SAS veteran, however, flatly denied all the statements by the defense regarding the incident.
Another episode brought to light was related to the killing of two Afghans around October 20, 2012, when Roberts-Smith’s unit was deployed to the village of Syahchow, pursuing a Taliban target. According to the defense, the corporal took a young soldier – known only as Person 66 – into a compound where two Afghan men were held. The prisoners were taken to a field afterwards, where Person 66 was ordered to murder them to get the rookie “blooded.”
The aftermath of the incident was allegedly witnessed by now-Deputy Defense Minister Andrew Hastie – an SAS captain at the time – who allegedly saw Person 66 visibly shaking after the shooting. While admitting he saw Hastie that day, Roberts-Smith denied the shooting, stating the alleged “blooding” incident “never happened.” Hastie is expected to testify before the court later during the 12-week trial.
The landmark trial kicked off earlier this month; Roberts-Smith brought to court the three newspapers – The Age, the Sydney Morning Herald, and the Canberra Times – which accused him in a series of articles published in 2018 of committing at least six unlawful killings during his deployment in Afghanistan, as well as engaging in other misconduct.Also on rt.com ‘We were fighting & in danger. To now say that’s a war crime makes me really angry’ – is Aussie SAS killer a hero or a villain?
The outlets are commonly known as ‘Nine newspapers’, in reference to Nine Entertainment, which owned them at the time of publication. Roberts-Smith’s lawyers told the court the publications kicked off a “poisonous campaign” against the soldier, ruining his reputation and his whole life.
Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!