Goldman Sachs banker ‘wins £1 mn’ in maternity discrimination dispute
Sonia Pereiro-Mendez, who was the bank’s analyst on the distressed credit desk, claims she was cheated out of millions of pounds in bonuses and subjected to sexist comments over her pregnancy. She added she was “publicly mocked” and subjected to “gratuitous and implicitly derogatory references to her childcare arrangements,” FT reports.
Her claim, which she submitted to court, said she “took
exceptional measures” to perform the tasks requested of her
by Goldman Sachs during her maternity leave, such as
“arranging for her in-laws to look after her baby in a car
park during a relevant meeting so that she could swiftly
breastfeed her baby during breaks from the meeting.”
The mother of two children saw her annual income cut from £250,000 ($373,00) to £192,000 ($286,000), after she informed her employer about her first pregnancy in 2011.
Four years ago, the plaintiff received a bonus of £200,000 ($298,000), but she believes the amount due should have been £910,000 ($1.35 million), which is five percent of the profits she brought to Goldman Sachs.
Pereiro-Mendez claimed her salary and bonuses were cut, as her superiors believed she would not be able to make a career and bring benefits to the bank having given birth to children. Pereiro-Mendez said she secretly recorded these conversations on tape and planned to play them during the court hearings.
However, the case never went to trial. Pereiro-Mendez withdrew
her claims just before her case was about to be heard at the
Central London Employment Tribunal on Tuesday.
The terms of the deal between the bank and Pereiro-Mendez were not disclosed. However, the Daily Telegraph reveals the payout could exceed £1 million ($1.5 million).
Goldman Sachs denied all the accusations from its former employee. "We are pleased that this issue has been resolved," the bank said in a statement.