Minor but not “systemic” violations found in Belarus election
Belarus election was monitored by 1032 foreign observers, including 66 Russian representatives. It took more than a month for the Central Election Commission to draw up the document. Normally such reports are prepared more quickly. For example, a similar report on a recent referendum in South Sudan appeared just ten days after it was held. The body’s secretary Nikolay Konkin explained they delay by the necessity to sum up the results of the observation.According to deputy head of the commission, Leonid Ivleev, who presented the report on Wednesday, foreign observers worked in the “atmosphere of sincerity and openness and had access to all election procedures.”He noted the difference between the Belarusian electoral system and its law compared to Russian electoral practice. For example, in Belarus observers are not supposed to receive copies of protocols drawn up at polling stations. Another difference is that citizens can provide not only a passport but also other documents proving their ID to obtain a ballot. Also, “silence day”, when all campaigning is forbidden ahead of the election, actually lasts longer and it is more appropriate to call it “a fortnight of silence.”As for “some violations” found, Ivleev mentioned a web camera at one of the polling stations. The local election commission members “could explain who put the camera there and where the pictures were transmitted to,” Ivleev said. He added observers were sometimes placed so that it was difficult to watch the election process. Some minor violations also included instances of “family voting”, when several relatives entered the polling booth together. “The violations we found were not large-scale or systemic,” Ivleev concluded. “We do not doubt the legitimacy of presidential election in Belarus.” OSCE observers say Belarus election did not comply with European standards and the results were highly influenced by the dispersal of protests in Minsk on December 19.