Russia ready for global internet shutdown, can sustain its own web – MPs
The new legislation (which could cost up to US$466mn) envisions a full range of measures to ensure the operation of the Russian internet and to counter cyber-threats. They include the creation of a national DNS system that stores all domain names and corresponding IP addresses, and would provide cryptographic data protection.
The bill also restricts the transfer of data shared between Russian internet users to servers outside of the country.Also on rt.com ‘Who knows what they have in mind?’ Putin says Russia could be cut off from global internet
Introduced by a group of lawmakers in December 2018, the bill was designed as a response to the “aggressive” US National Cyber Strategy, which accuses Russia, along with China, Iran, and North Korea, of using cyber tools to “undermine” its economy and democracy. It also threatens dire consequences for anyone conducting cyber activity against the US.
According to lawmakers, if relations with the West reach a new low and the US goes as far as cutting off Russian IP addresses, the nation will need an autonomous segment of the internet that would work smoothly and ensure communication and data transfer between Russian users.Also on rt.com Russia can be unplugged from World Wide Web, but it’s not quite ready – co-founder of Kaspersky Lab
Though there are no precedents for a deliberate blocking of the internet for entire countries, experts say it’s technically possible. ICANN, the organization that maintains the central repository for IP addresses and helps coordinate the supply of IP addresses, is registered in the US. In 2012, then-US President Barack Obama signed an executive order allowing him to take control of all communications on American soil, including those crucial for the normal operation of the internet.
This legislation became a hot topic in Russia as many feared the Russian government was seeking to regulate and censor the internet – or even create an isolated one of its own. However, the legislation’s sponsors argued that it is aimed to ensure internet’s operation, not building a “sovereign internet,” like in China.
Like this story? Share it with a friend!