Can the Million Mask March turn a vendetta into a victory?
Anything else outside of that is normally swept under the control desk. The amnesty-immigration rally that took place on the National Mall in Washington DC during the government shutdown was given prime time by the media because it promoted a political party agenda. This is the globalist, corporatist way of keeping control over “consensus reality” regarding dissident movements. In other words: if it’s not on the BBC, or CNN, then it didn’t really happen.
That old stratagem of control is becoming less and less effective as word of mouth has also become globalized.
Despite the media blackout, this one was still hard to miss – an
international Million Mask March organized by demonstrators
around the globe and fronted by the hackivist confab known as
The million masks they are referring to are that of the Guy Fawkes caricature made hugely famous by the blockbuster film, “V for Vendetta,” which was adopted as the public face of hacker group Anonymous.
Marches took place at 450 locations in cities all over the world. Different regional groups had various, long lists of grievances, but you could boil it down to systemic corruption throughout government and censorship in the media – all for the benefit of corporations. It’s hard to argue that this isn’t the case everywhere.
Sparse mainstream media coverage of one of the largest events, in
central London, was almost exclusively fashioned around celebrity
personalities in attendance, like Russell Brand, who could be
seen tweeting from Trafalgar Square, and who, amidst all the Guy
Fawkes masks and black balaclavas – provided a recognizable
anchor for media photographers and journalists.
At first, I was skeptical of this march for a number of reasons, not least of all because of the opaque nature of this version of civil disobedience – hiding behind a mask. Beyond the Hollywood references, what does it really mean?
This is perhaps the most profound - but not the most surprising
aspect, of our brave new post-Snowden world, where a very
significant social trend is defined by a disguise. It’s the idea
that surveillance has become so pervasive that dissenters no
longer wish to show their faces whilst protesting in public or in
their parallel world online. Question: doesn’t this approach
actually empower the state in the long run?
Where Hollywood forges a new reality, the real world tends to bend it back into place. Besides the obvious theatrical benefits, in the movie “V for Vendetta” the masked march was vindicated because the objective was achieved – parliament was successfully blown up, and the corrupt head of state and inner circle of corrupt politicians exposed and brought to justice. The scenes in London and Washington DC didn’t have as desirable an ending as maybe fans of the film might prefer. British police could be seen in their usual show of force – storm troopers bullying crowds, cherry-picking young males and bundling them into the back of police vans, and then driving onto the sidewalk with lights and sirens blaring. Crowds eventually dispersed and returned home.
It is an extraordinary thing that a piece of British tradition
and folklore such as Guy Fawkes Day has made the rounds on the
global popular culture circuit, and even more incredible that
this mantelpiece of culture would be imported into America with
such fervor. That was made possible because that piece of British
history was first transformed into a DC Comics edition, and then
into a larger-than-life mythology recreated by Hollywood, and not
just for entertainment – but for profit, giant profits in fact.
Turns out that the rights to the iconic Guy Fawkes mask made
famous by the “V for Vendetta” film are owned by Warner
Brothers – so a royalty on every mask purchased goes directly
into the pockets of Hollywood fat cats. The irony for both the
Million Mask March and Anonymous cannot be ignored. Both would
aid in the transfer of millions of dollars out of the pockets of
demonstrators, before trickling up to the very institutions and
intellectual property moguls who are their sworn enemies, often
referred to as “the 1 percent.”
In 2013, the 99 percent are still heavily reliant on the 1 percent for most things, from their smart phones to their symbology, and even for their counterculture. Why can’t the 99 percent fashion their own symbols and market the kind of iconography which Hollywood managed with the Guy Fawkes mask? No doubt, a few media executives and shareholders are snickering at this unique situation.
To get a better understanding of the Million Mask March, I decided to spend a few hours riding shotgun via the Internet. I joined their DC march around 4pm EST just before dusk on the East Coast from my remote viewing location in London via a Livestream link, courtesy of one demonstrator known as “James From The Internet.” The demonstration had split into two or three main groups; I was following the group heading toward the White House.
For anyone who hasn’t yet followed a live event through an
independent video stream, you are missing what is probably the
purist experience in live media – all the sights and sounds of a
live event, with essential commentary, and no commercial breaks.
Video operator James was well prepared for the long DC march with
his GoPro camera and a backpack full of extra batteries to power
his camera and phone for the duration of the Livestream link.
James was what every media ground correspondent should be, but so
often isn’t – accessible, down to earth, and friendly.
At first glance, the event in DC resembled the Occupy movement in many ways – appearing to attract subscribers from a similar demographic, and using much of the same language and strap lines – “We are the 99 percent,” and decrying the crimes of “the 1 percent.” Occupy slogans were being chanted by the crowds. “Show me what democracy looks like, this is what democracy looks like!” was followed by, “Whose streets? Our streets!”
You could hear the crowd chanting the famous Guy Fawkes line as they marched down Constitution Avenue, “Remember, remember, the 5th of November…”
Here is when I came to understand that this young crowd marching in DC was not at all one-dimensional, or as robotic as your garden-variety Occupy crowds. The chants continued to expand on previous calls, shouting, “Whose world? Our world!”
Things got more interesting as the column marched towards the US
Federal Reserve building, chanting, “End the Fed, end the
Fed!” A small group stopped for a brief rally at the steps of
Passing the Federal Reserve, crowds pointed, and shouted: “Show me what hypocrisy looks like – that is what hypocrisy looks like!”
The conversation progressed: “We go to war in a foreign country, when all we have at home is bulls*** and hypocrisy!”
Up to this point, police had been mostly playing the role of shepherd, with some instigating and a few minor altercations. One masked marcher could be heard describing a brush with the police: “One cop kept asking us, ‘Who is the leader? We need to speak to him,” to which the protester replied, “There is no leader!” That exchange summed up how detached and out of touch law enforcement really is with what was going on that day.
Crowds were now closing in on the White House, chanting: “White House, Our House!”
Now in front of the White House lawn, this was perhaps the most encouraging part of this political adventure, and the point you knew this was not a Democrat party-steered, “Occupy-Lite” exercise. These kids had character, that was for sure. You could hear the crowd booming:
“Obama come out, we got some s*** to talk about! Obama come out, we got some s*** to talk about!”
Police moved in swiftly to form a barrier between the White House lawn gates and the masked crowd. One police officer could be heard asking people, “Please move back.” The crowd responded in kind. Soon after, James ended his Livestream transmission.
The age of the globally-coordinated flash protest has arrived. In the last few months alone, a number of well-organized and highly intelligent global demonstrations have been staged to protest a range of issues, from western military intervention in Syria to the cartel activities of GMO giants such as Monsanto. In Britain, the anti-fracking protests and the rally against the privatization of the NHS outside of the Tory Party conference were also significant. Both delivered the numbers and their message, but were blanked by the mainstream media.
The Million Mask March delivered the numbers, but somehow the message got lost somewhere behind the mask. But what this group lacked in succinct communication and a packaged political message, they made up for in hard graft, commitment and determination. The level of mental and physical commitment should be applauded – 10 hours of continuous demonstrations and marching. Contrast this to the veterans’ march a few weeks earlier, where demonstrators were active and even dumped metal barriers at the White House gates, but only congregated for about three to four hours, before they dispersed and headed home.
Aside from that, this DC march showed a level of independence,
political realism and intelligence that cut right through the
stale left versus right political paradigm. If systemic
corruption in government and collusion with corporate raiders is
going to be reformed, then we will certainly need crowds who can
elevate the conversation to a higher level – like this crowd did
on the Million Mask March in DC.
This crowd was young, creative and energetic and used most of the tools available to them. They clearly have chosen this homogeneous mask as their means of self-expression, which may seem contradictory on the surface, but indicates a far deeper psychological argument. Everyone should pay attention, stop and ask why young people are reaching for the mask. It speaks volumes in terms of where social politics are for this generation.
Now for the next challenge: How will they make their V move from just a Vendetta to a Victory? If you remember, at the end of the film, everyone took their masks off revealing a sea of individuals sharing similar values.
In real political terms, that’s where the real power is.
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.