Exposing public figures’ offensive social media posts from the past isn’t about justice. It’s about envy.

23 Jun, 2021 19:01

As a journalist, John Scott Lewinski hustles around the world, writing for more than 30 international news organization covering news, lifestyle and technology. As an author, he is represented by the Fineprint Literary Agency, New York.

Barely a week goes by without someone prominent being tripped up by dumb comments made online years ago. The vultures of cancel culture who dig up this dirt are nothing but jealous predators who deserve our utmost contempt.

It’s 2018. The annual Major League Baseball All-Star Game brings together the top 21st century stars of The Great American Pastime. Among the National League’s pitching staff is Josh Hader, relief hurler for the Milwaukee Brewers. It’s his first appearance in the mid-season celebration of the game, a landmark in the young athlete’s career and, quite literally, a dream come true.

The day of the game, some viciously eager opportunist locates and highlights a series of sarcastic racist and homophobic tweets Hader sent out six years prior, when he was 17. While his fellow players closed ranks and defended him as a friend and teammate, Hader had to issue a public apology and leave social media. Perhaps as a result of his public humiliation, Hader pitched poorly in his first All-Star Game appearance. 

Also on rt.com Trying to skewer someone for dumb social media posts made 9 years ago as a teen is a new low for cancel culture

Whoever ratted out Hader’s adolescent uttering and tainted his big night never stepped forward publicly. 

Fast forward to the spring of 2021. Cricketer Ollie Robinson is bowling over his sport as an addition to the English test squad. Again, a series of racist and sexist tweets resurfaces from about a decade ago when Robinson was 19. The result? Public derision and suspension after just one match for the national team. 

While there is no indication the now 27-year-old athlete still holds any of those juvenile views he glibly tossed around as a teen, someone sees fit to shame him amid his sudden success. When he should be enjoying the heights of well-earned advancement, he must shy away from public life. 

The crusading champion of social justice who chose to rat out Robinson remained in the darkest hole available. 

So, those of us who do our best to live our lives in peace, working to survive and reaching out to improve ourselves day to day, now face these twisted armies of trolls (in this case, doubly defined in internet slang as online trouble makers and in the real world as lonely and hideous denizens of darkness). They scour the social media records of the accomplished and prominent, maintaining a cancerous inventory of expressed indiscretions from younger days. 

Probably thumb-typed during the hormone-clouded grind of adolescence, these ill-fated missives often contain some politically disavowed blurt of vitriol or a term or two that simply cannot allow their letters to arrange themselves in order, lest the great enlightened target the speaker for cancellation. 

Put more reasonably, folks make foolish statements when they’re kids. Unfortunately, the infinite recording ability of social media allows those clumsy remarks to live forever under the day’s chatter – waiting for some morally blind mole to dig them up and put them to work without conscience or remorse.

In truth, a buck-toothed rodent is an incorrect bestial analogy. A vulture stands in much better: Imagine the ugly, ever-vigilant creature in its arid wastelands – sitting up on buzzing power lines, watching the living below. It waits for one of the human beings working through the challenges of their lives to misstep, stumble and fall by stating some censored sin. The scavenger then swoops down, claws extended, seizing on the lapse in judgement – even if it’s a ghost of childish words long since passed. It picks the bones of human error with enough noise that the world takes rueful note – flying away before anyone can identify their work. 

Also on rt.com Covid has made celebrities out of public officials we'd never have heard of – no wonder they don't want restrictions to end

I long to interrogate this sort of parasite. You’ll forgive me if I take this opportunity to address such a snake directly here, even if the accused is an imaginary avatar for these venomous predators. There’s a bold, entitled cruelty to this brand of self-righteous, gleeful assault, and there are a number of assumptions I can make about the attacker:

Even with all these observations, I’m left with questions: What do you gain by seizing on another human being’s past indiscretions? Do you use some delusion of ‘raising awareness’ to justify or excuse your snitching? Isn’t it exhausting to scour social media to inventory so many channels, hoping to mine the little poisonous shards you like to stab under fingernails? When you find a festering piece of aging refuse that can damage another person’s life, have you no grasp of human frailty…no remnant of compassion? 

I assume the notion of social justice or activism that drives you to mount your anonymous public assassinations is somehow based on the highest intentions of understanding, tolerance, love and equality. Can you explain how revealing someone’s silly slips of the online tongue from years ago serves that? Can you explain how your cruelty and the pain you cause honors any of the values your concept of justice serves? 

Also on rt.com It must be a conspiracy! From Kennedy to Area 51 and Gates to Epstein, the world offers people a lot of deeply outlandish theories

Your backstabbing isn’t about peace, love and understanding. It’s about prejudice, rage and your decision that, if you can’t be satisfied in life, no one can. You’re a nasty little poacher, hunting more successful fellows in the bleak hope they you can hang their happiness like a fetid pelt on your empty wall. 

Find something else to do with what life you have left.

Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!