Polish PM: stop politicizing presidential plane crash
This comes as the country's parliament is evaluating the final report into the tragedy.
A lot of outrage was initially heard from Poland, but today’s address by the Polish prime minister comes as a voice of reason. Tusk made it clear that it is unwise to politicize the tragedy, and that the quest for truth should not be marred by political blame games.
The prime minister also recommended to the country’s opposition to refrain from sensationalizing the investigation and from concocting conspiracy theories, and to instead work with the findings put forth by the Interstate Aviation Committee (IAC). He stressed that politicizing the issue would not serve Poland’s interests.
“The Polish government wants the truth to be complete,” Tusk said. “And we realize that it will be inconvenient for many. There is a complex number of causes for the crash. It’s convenient for some to blame the pilots that were under pressure. For others it’ll be convenient to blame the Russians, but it won’t be the whole truth. The organization that seeks the truth mustn’t be influenced by forces in Poland that want it to be convenient for them.”
The debate continues despite Russia publishing the full transcript of the crew's communication with air traffic controllers. It is evident from the recordings that air traffic controllers did warn the pilots against landing, did offer them to use an alternative airport, and did warn them about the flight conditions. Moreover, the onboard monitoring system also warned the pilots to pull up. But despite all that, the crew made the fatal decision to land.
Many in Poland subscribe to the opinion that the air traffic controllers should have outright forbidden the Polish pilots to land on Smolensk-Severny airfield and force them to use an alternative airport instead. However, it has been said by many authorities in Russia, Poland and within the international aviation community that no air traffic controller has that authority. Therefore, it is the pilot’s decision, and hence his responsibility, to choose where the landing is to take place.
According to Konstanty Gebert, a columnist at the Gazeta Wyborcza newspaper, there is not much room for debate with regard to the main aspects of the investigation.
“It is obvious that the primary responsibility for the crash lies with the Polish pilots, who should not have landed,” he told RT. “The point is, however, whether all the reasons that contributed to the crash have been elucidated. And Poland has been very critical… about not publishing an extensive transcript of conversations of the air [traffic] controllers with the plane.”
“The committee has now posted this transcript on its website, as if after the fact recognizing that they should have addressed the issue sooner,” the Polish journalist added.
Fred Weir, the Moscow bureau chief of the Christian Science Monitor, agreed that the Interstate Aviation Committee’s report on the Polish presidential plane crash is the most authoritative analysis of the data.
“That level of transparency – in a report like that – is almost unprecedented in Russia,” he said. “So it suggests that the Russian aviation authorities are confident in their findings.”
However, Weir was critical about the way the Russian authorities presented their findings.
“The Russian government probably should have shown more foresight,” he told RT. “I don’t think they presented the report in the best possible way.”
“Whatever the technical conclusions, the political presentation was not the best, and it has allowed this political storm to unfold in Poland,” Weir added.