icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm
29 Jun, 2022 13:38

Germany weighs in on NATO plans for Eastern Europe

Berlin has allegedly suggested basing key infrastructure near the Russian border, but keeping troops stationed in their home countries
Germany weighs in on NATO plans for Eastern Europe

Germany has reportedly objected to the idea of sending several thousand more NATO troops to Russia's western borders, and suggested an alternative scheme instead. That's according to the newspaper Die Welt. 

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz has proposed stationing support units and fuel stocks in the Baltic states and Poland, but he doesn't back the deployment of entire additional brigades to the countries, according to the report. The majority of troops, under Scholz’s plan, would remain in their home nations, at full combat readiness, only conducting short-term maneuvers abroad.

As part of NATO’s Enhanced Forward Presence, the military bloc is planning to send an additional 5,000 troops each to Poland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, Die Welt added. According to the newspaper, German troops will support Lithuania, while UK soldiers will be based in Estonia and Canada will bolster Latvia. The US already has a brigade-strong contingent stationed in Poland.

However, deploying so many soldiers would be costly, and the three supporting nations are already low on fully equipped brigades, the newspaper explained.

Lieutenant-general Heinrich Brauss, a former high-ranking NATO official, told the outlet that the German military will only be able to provide such support in the coming years. This is apparently the case for other European NATO member states as well.

It is these problems that reportedly led Chancellor Scholz to propose the alternative scheme.

Unnamed “NATO diplomats” are cited by Die Welt as lauding Berlin’s plan as a “flexible, concentrated deployment,” that offers the opportunity to also re-dispatch troops to other battlefields, if necessary.

Berlin, however, has yet to convince the UK and Canada to agree to this model during the ongoing NATO summit in Madrid, the article claims.

The Baltic states are reportedly unhappy with the prospect of only having truncated brigades on their territories. According to Die Welt, Tallinn, Vilnius and Riga fear that without additional forces, they will be more easily occupied by an invading Russian army, in case of war.

The outlet went on to describe the three nations as NATO’s “Achilles heel” in the East due to their proximity to mainland Russia and its exclave in Kaliningrad. Russian troops could take the region sooner than the military bloc could deploy adequate reinforcements from Central Europe, the journalists claim. In this scenario, the Baltic nations could only be liberated as part of a counter-offensive.

Shortly after Russia attacked Ukraine in late February, NATO expanded its presence in the east. The number of troops in each of the international battle groups stationed in the Baltic states and Poland rose from 800 to more than 1,000. NATO combat units of a similar size were stationed in Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Romania.