Impeachment or ‘coup’? Peruvian Congress votes to oust president over ‘moral incapacity’
Legislators in Lima voted 105-19 on Monday to remove Vizcarra from office, citing Article 113 of the constitution to declare the office vacant. President of Congress Manuel Merino was selected to take over as interim president of the country until an election can be held in 2021.
“No to the presidential vacancy,” or #NoALaVacanciaPresidencial!”People rally in Lima after Peru’s President Martin Vizcarra was forced out of office when congress unexpectedly voted to impeach him over corruption allegations. More: https://t.co/H8gwZEsKXEpic.twitter.com/X7O4FExsXs— Bloomberg Quicktake (@Quicktake) November 10, 2020
The ouster comes amid Peru’s economic collapse due to the Covid-19 pandemic, with a 30 percent GDP drop in the second quarter of 2020 and one of the highest coronavirus death rates in the world, Bloomberg reported.
However, at least one scholar is warning that Monday’s events amount to a parliamentary coup akin to the ouster of presidents in Honduras, Paraguay and Brazil over the past decade.
The media is reporting the situation in Peru as an impeachment. It is not. Or if so, it is in the same vein as the “impeachment” of Zelaya in Honduras in 2009, Lugo in Paraguay in 2012, and Rousseff in Brazil in 2016 - i.e. a parliamentary coup. Pls report accordingly— Alonso Gurmendi (@Alonso_GD) November 10, 2020
Like the 25th Amendment in the US, Article 113 of the Peruvian constitution actually envisioned ousting a president due to physical or ‘mental’ incapacity, according to Alfonso Gurmendi, a professor at Universidad Pacifico. That definition was reinterpreted in 2000 to impeach President Alberto Fujimori, who had fled a corruption probe to Japan.Also on rt.com Bolivia’s former ‘interim president' and coup government ministers could face trial over 2019 crackdown on protesters
The current Congress has cited the existence of an investigation into Vizcarra to claim he suffers from “moral incapacity” and declare the office vacant. In the absence of a clear definition of what qualifies as immoral, whatever the congressional majority says apparently goes.
Immorality ends up being whatever 87 votes in Congress says is too immoral. It is impossible to defend against such a charge. In this case, immorality is defined as "having an unfinished investigation open". The disproportion is, of course, evident.— Alonso Gurmendi (@Alonso_GD) November 10, 2020
“So, no, this is not an impeachment,” argued Gurmendi. “It is, in essence, a parliamentary coup.”
Vizcarra became president in 2018, after his predecessor Pedro Pablo Kuczynski resigned under pressure from the opposition, led by Fujimori’s daughter Keiko. This is not the first time Congress has tried to remove him – they sought to impeach him in September 2019, when he dissolved the legislature and called for a snap election, but failed. The current chamber was elected in January 2020.Also on rt.com Ecuador’s Correa is latest example of Latin America’s right-wing using courts to smash adversaries, hold power
Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!