Facebook bans deepfakes ahead of US election, but vows no collateral damage against satire or parody videos
Under the new rules, announced Monday by Monika Bickert, Facebook’s head of global policy management, videos will be removed from Instagram and Facebook if they meet two criteria.
Videos will be automatically flagged by Facebook if they have “been edited or synthesised … in ways that aren’t apparent to an average person and would likely mislead someone into thinking that a subject of the video said words that they did not actually say” or if they are “the product of artificial intelligence or machine learning that merges, replaces or superimposes content onto a video, making it appear to be authentic.”Also on rt.com ‘If you are suckers, it’s not my fault!’ Even creepy deepfake Putin won't admit to meddling in US elections (VIDEO)
If a video is deemed to be false or partly false, Facebook will “significantly reduce” its distribution in users’ news feeds and reject it outright if it is posing as an ad.
The company is opting to leave such offending videos on the platform but marking them false, to help prevent them spreading under false pretences on other social media platforms and elsewhere on the internet.
In a bid to cover all its bases, Facebook said that even videos that do not meet these two criteria would still be eligible for “independent review” by the company's third-party fact-checkers, which include 50 partners covering 40 languages.Also on rt.com Fake or Deepfake? Why modern technology leaves us with little choice but to revive critical thinking
Facebook gave no immediate, clear examples of what type of content would be in breach of such rules though it did state that the policy does not cover ‘shallow fakes’ or videos made using traditional video editing tools, while claiming that parody and satire videos would be exempted.
“This policy does not extend to content that is parody or satire, or video that has been edited solely to omit or change the order of words,” Bickert stated.Also on rt.com Conservative satire as popular as mainstream news, journalists and cyberwarriors furious
One example of the difference in content which contravenes the guidelines and that which does not would be videos shared last year of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi slurring her speech. This footage would apparently not contravene Facebook's new ‘deepfake’ guidelines as it was merely slowed down, and the audio pitch-shifted, using traditional video editing techniques.
In 2018, Donald Trump shared a video of a Fox News segment which was edited in such a way as to make it appear as though Pelosi was fumbling her words. This would fall under “traditional video editing techniques” and would therefore be allowed on the platform.
“PELOSI STAMMERS THROUGH NEWS CONFERENCE” pic.twitter.com/1OyCyqRTuk— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 24, 2019
But another video that went viral online purported to show Pelosi slurring far more heavily and was often posted with titles insinuating that she was drunk. This type of video falls somewhere in the middle as it has been both slowed down and pitch-shifted though not necessarily by an AI or machine learning algorithm, and would therefore likely be referred to the third party fact checkers for review.
Nancy Pelosi has been drinking again..How long will democrats let this lush be the face of their party?How embarrassing!@SpeakerPelosi get your act together!Rt if you think this is disgraceful to see a speaker of the house wasted during a speech! pic.twitter.com/XedI1yu743— Andrew (@smalltownandrew) May 25, 2019
However, the company added that if a politician posts something which breaches the deepfake guidelines, they may still allow it to remain, even if it was expressly intended to mislead, if Facebook deems the public interest in seeing it outweighs the potential harm.
Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!