German ‘vigilantes’ escape conviction after beating & tying refugee to tree
The four men were acquitted of any charges on Monday. While the investigation of the incident lasted almost a year, the hearings were concluded in just one day.
The defendants punched the victim, an Iraqi man who had refugee status, before kicking him out of a store and then tying him to a tree in the eastern German town of Arnsdorf in May 2016.
The Iraqi refugee was due to testify in court as a witness but his dead body was found last week in central Saxony. Police say the man had frozen to death in January.
While the prosecution filed charges of unlawful detention, the group claimed their actions were in “self-defense.”
The migrant, who had been receiving treatment at a local mental health institution, went to the supermarket to complain about a phone card he had purchased earlier.
The man had already been to the store twice before the incident, when store employees had explained to him that the funds on the card had been depleted. Local media reported at the time that the migrant had insisted that the card was faulty.
However, the language barrier apparently made communication difficult.
It was during his third visit that the situation escalated.
The moment of the attack on the migrant was captured on video and later emerged online. The footage shows the Iraqi man arguing with the cashier and brandishing a bottle of wine angrily. A security guard blocked the man’s way out of the store and tried to reach for the bottle, but the refugee refused to hand it over.
The footage then shows that instead of the police arriving, the group of four ‘vigilantes’ appear. They promptly tackle the man without discussion, taking away the bottle of wine and then beating him up.
"What do you want here? You pig!" the men yelled.
The footage ends with the men being dragged out of the store, while the woman filming the incident says, “it’s such a pity that we need a self-defense group.”
The refugee was subsequently tied to a tree with cables, where he remained until police arrived.
The investigation, however, did not find any evidence proving that the group was organized or that the action was premeditated.
Supporters of the group of men gathered in front of the court building while the ruling was being announced.
“The people [defendants] have not acted inappropriately. After what emerged in the aftermath, the man was dangerous, which has been denied in the media,” a protester told RT’s Ruptly news agency.
“The people have reacted to a dangerous situation, spontaneously. They were not part of a civil defense or whatsoever,” another protester added.
While some praised the decision for not punishing citizens for “moral courage,” others expressed fears that the ruling might send a “dangerous signal” to vigilante groups across country.
“The judge made a good decision,” Thomas Israel, the executive secretary of the district chapter of Chancellor Angela Merkel's Christian Democrats (CDU) in Saxony's Bautzen region, told DW. “It shows that citizens can still display moral courage without having to be afraid that it could land them in court.”
The head of the Greens in the state of Saxony, Jürgen Kasek, disagreed, however, saying that the four men had resorted to unnecessary violence instead of just calling the police, adding that the migrant hadn’t even tried to flee the scene.
“The court is saying that the four men's behavior was acceptable,” Kasek said. “This sends a dangerous signal to vigilante groups across the country, who now feel they have the right to enact arbitrary law. We could see a rise in violence after this.”
Some people online echoed Kasek’s fears.
“[With the decision] the Saxon judiciary opens the door to vigilante-justice for the Nazis. What a failure,” the caption reads.