icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm

CIA chief invokes Paris attack to justify breach of privacy

CIA chief invokes Paris attack to justify breach of privacy
The terrorist attack in Paris happened because perpetrators used encrypted Internet communications that intelligence services couldn’t break, CIA director John Brennan said.

There were indicators of an imminent attack before the Paris attack, but the intelligence community failed to identify the threat, he told CBS News’ 60 Minutes program.

“We knew the system was blinking red. We knew just in the days before that ISIL was trying to carry out something. But the individuals involved have been able to take advantage of the newly available means of communication that are – that are walled off, from law enforcement officials,” Brennan said.

“You're talking about encrypted Internet communications,” 60 Minutes host Scott Pelley responded.

“Yeah, I'm talking about the very sophisticated use of these technologies and communication systems,” Brennan said.

Internet encryption has become a major issue for tech companies after the revelation that the US and its allies had programs for mass electronic surveillance. Giants such as Google and Apple offered users end-to-end encryption in certain applications to protect the privacy of communications.

Some law enforcement and intelligence agencies are sounding the alarm, saying they needed access to communications of suspected criminals and terrorists to do their job properly.

Later in the interview, Brennan talked about cyberwarfare and the ramifications for privacy posed by new communication technology. Asked whether privacy was dead, he said: “No, no. Privacy should never be dead.”

“But is it, in fact, with these hacktivists, with these nation-state actors, with all the things that we've learned about government snooping all around the world, isn't it effectively dead?” Pelley said.

Brennan’s response was to defend the mass surveillance programs by saying that people were often willing to discard their privacy anyway.

“You know, it's interesting that people always point to the government or others in terms of the invasion of privacy,” he said. “But individuals are liberally giving up their privacy, you know, sometimes wittingly and sometimes unwittingly as they give information to companies or to sales reps. Or they go out on Facebook or the various social media. They don't realize though that they are then making themselves vulnerable to exploitation.”

Speaking about how vulnerable the US was to a major cyberattack, Brennan said those who would be willing to launch one don’t have the capability to do it yet.

“I think fortunately right now those who may have the capability do not have the intent. Those who may have the intent right now I believe do not have the capability. Because if they had the capability they would deploy and employ those tools,” he said.

READ MORE: ISIS used chemical weapons, may have more - CIA chief

The CIA head also said Islamic State had access to chemical weapons and probably the technology to produce chemical agents in small quantities. This part of the interview was published last week as a preview to the full program.