Shh, it got serious! RT accused of anti-Semitism for satire Rap News episode
US President Barack Obama’s former speechwriter Jon Lovett coined
the phrase “the culture of shut up” where views that do not
conform are silenced by often misplaced moral outrage. To name
but a few recent cases, former CEO of Mozilla Brendan Eich was
silenced and forced to resign after it hit headlines he had
supported California’s Proposition 8 which sought to ban same sex
marriages. While Somali activist Ayaan Hirsi Ali fell afoul of
the mainstream for her criticism of Islam, which sparked outrage
among religious groups.
RT has fallen into the same trap and been branded as anti-Semite by a Jewish rights organization. The Wiesenthal Center has demanded a public apology over a satirical show broadcast on RT they say expressed “raw Jew hatred.”
The channel has denied these claims labeling them as “baseless” and “outrageous” and maintains the show in fact depicts the exact opposite, acknowledging the tragedy of the Holocaust and the right to a Jewish state.
The Wiesenthal Center published a statement on its website on May 12, decrying an Australian-made, satirical show called Juice Rap News which is broadcast on RT. The organization leveled claims of anti-Semitism at RT, pertaining to an installment of Juice News entitled “Israel vs. Palestine” broadcasted three weeks ago.
The episode contains parodied versions of Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu and US Secretary of State John Kerry as well
as a host of others, and intimates that those who challenge
Israel’s policy on the occupied territories are branded as
“Eight minutes of raw Jew-hatred,” is how the group
described the sketch. It went on to demand an apology from the
channel and call for the dismissal of “those
responsible.” If action is not taken the organization has
threatened to raise the matter with “a higher authority”
on the grounds that it allegedly violates Russian membership
obligations under the 2004 Berlin Declaration on Anti-Semitism of
the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE).
In addition, the statement said Shimon Samuels, the Director of International Relations at the Wiesenthal Center, had sent a letter to RT’s Editor-in-Chief and Managing Director – Margarita Simonyan and Aleksey Nikolov.
RT responded to the Wiesenthal Center, saying they had unfortunately received no letter and had learnt about the accusations through media coverage.
“We find these accusations to be baseless, outrageous and defamatory,” wrote RT, stressing the show regularly criticizes political figures from Russia and the US.
“RT does not air or publish hate speech, plain and simple. The video in question never voices anti-Semitic sentiments.”
RT says the sketch is the exact opposite and acknowledges the tragedy of the Holocaust and the right of the Jews to have “sanctuary” in the form of the Jewish state. In this way the channel insists the program “in no way violates the provisions of the Berlin Declaration on Anti-Semitism.”
The channel has demanded an apology for the accusations from the Wiesenthal Center.
“These charges are an affront to the leadership and employees of the network, many of whom have family members who have suffered ethnic persecution – including the network’s editor in chief,” said RT.
The Wiesenthal Center’s accusations are indicative of a strategy
to try and silence debate on the Israeli-Palestinian debate,
author and media analyst, Danny Schechter told RT.
“This criticism is ridiculous, it’s obviously written by people who don’t know anything about satire,” said Schechter. He said that the Center fails to make the distinction between news and satire.
“They’re so used to hearing voices that agree with them, it is very hard for them to accept a voice that questions them,” he said.
Schechter also broached the accusations of “self-hatred”
leveled at American political scientist Norman Finkelstein who
appears in the Juice News episode.
“It suggests that if you’re Jewish and you criticize Israel, somehow you’re a self-hater, a self-hating Jew,” said Schechter, stating that this tactic is used to silence debate that challenges the status quo in current affairs. Any group setting itself up as an “arbiter of truth” is dangerous, said the political analyst.