On September 9, Ethiopia inaugurated the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) – the largest hydroelectric power plant in Africa and among the ten largest in the world. Its construction along the Blue Nile, the main tributary of the Nile, took nearly 14 years and occasionally strained relations with downstream countries. Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed delivered an impassioned speech at the opening ceremony.
“This lake has brought with it a wealth greater than Ethiopia’s GDP. This generation has accomplished a great deed with the Renaissance Dam. The era of begging has ended,” he said, addressing officials, media representatives, and African leaders.
Abiy Ahmed stood against the backdrop of the massive structure, with torrents of water flowing from the reservoir named Nigat Lake (Dawn Lake), which holds approximately 74 billion cubic meters of water. The project boasts a complex infrastructure with a capacity of 5,150 MW – equivalent to three medium-sized nuclear power plants. The construction cost exceeded $5 billion.
Currently, only 54% of Ethiopia’s roughly 120 million people have access to reliable electricity. The GERD is expected to double the country’s electricity generation capacity. Moreover, the authorities anticipate exporting surplus electricity to neighboring countries – Abiy Ahmed called the dam a “shared opportunity” for all of Africa.
Egypt and Sudan’s response amid flooding
While leaders and representatives from many African nations attended the inauguration of the dam, Egypt and Sudan, which had opposed the dam’s construction for years, ignored the official invitation.
As anticipated, Cairo’s reaction was negative. On the day of the GERD’s opening, Egypt submitted a letter to the UN Security Council warning against Ethiopia’s unilateral exploitation of the dam, deeming it a violation of international law. Just a month after the inauguration of the dam, at the Cairo Water Week conference, Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi stated that Egypt “will not stand idly by” as Ethiopia continues its “irresponsible” actions. He said that the lack of coordination in building and operating the GERD caused harm to downstream countries.
Sisi’s remarks were particularly striking amid flooding in the region caused by seasonal rains and the overflowing Nile. In early October, floods destroyed homes and fields in northern Egypt, especially in the El-Menoufia Governorate.
Sudan also faced significant flooding in Khartoum state, according to the UN’s International Organization for Migration. Devastating floods displaced around 1,200 people, exacerbating an already dire humanitarian crisis in a nation ravaged by a prolonged internal conflict.
However, it must be noted that seasonal flooding regularly impacts the region. In Sudan, the rainy season peaks between August and September. For example, in 2022, relentless downpours and subsequent flooding resulted in at least 134 fatalities, over 200 injuries, and significant property damage affecting more than 270,000 people, with around 17,000 homes destroyed; in response, the government declared a state of emergency.
Amid the natural disaster, Egypt’s Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation accused Addis Ababa of the “reckless unilateral” operation of the GERD. The ministry attributed this year’s late-season flooding to large, uncoordinated volumes of water released from the dam following its opening on September 9.
On October 3, Egypt’s Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation stated that water discharges surged to 485 million cubic meters on September 10 and peaked at 780 million on September 27, before gradually declining. This situation strained Sudan’s Roseires Dam and pushed excess water through to Egypt.
Addis Ababa refuted Cairo’s claims, labeling them falsehoods and distortions of reality. Ethiopia’s Ministry of Water and Energy stated that regulated water flow from the dam actually reduced peak flood levels in August and September, minimizing damage in downstream countries. It argued that without the dam, heavy rains would have caused “historical destruction in Sudan and Egypt.”
Sudan echoed Egypt’s concerns. In mid-October, during a meeting in Cairo between Egyptian President Sisi and Sudan’s Sovereign Council Chairman Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, the leaders reaffirmed “their firm rejection of any unilateral measures taken on the Blue Nile that contradict the relevant principles of international law.”
The Sudanese leader also said his country shares Egypt’s stance on the GERD project. The meeting resulted in an agreement to intensify efforts to establish bilateral mechanisms to protect their rights to Nile waters.
Nile rights: A colonial legacy
Negotiations over the GERD between Egypt and Sudan on one side and Ethiopia on the other have long stalled, and attempts to revive them have been unsuccessful. Egypt was primarily concerned about technical construction issues and the timeline for filling the reservoir, which threatened to deprive downstream countries of their share of Blue Nile water. Overall, Egypt has been staunchly opposed to the ambitious Ethiopian project, viewing it as a violation of its water rights.
Historically, Egypt and Sudan are entitled to 55.5 billion and 18.5 billion cubic meters of the Nile’s water, respectively. These rights are legally enshrined in the 1929 agreement with British colonial authorities and the 1959 Agreement for the Full Utilization of the Nile waters between Egypt and Sudan.
The 1929 agreement grants Egypt the largest share of the Nile’s waters and empowers it to oppose the construction of dams and other irrigation projects by upstream countries, including Ethiopia, Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania, Rwanda, and Burundi. In 2010, Nile Basin countries signed the Nile Basin Cooperative Framework Agreement (CFA), also known as the Entebbe Agreement, which challenged Egypt and Sudan’s water rights to the Nile. This agreement only took effect in 2024 after being ratified by South Sudan’s parliament. Unsurprisingly, Egypt and Sudan refused to participate in the signing of such an accord. Now, following its ratification, Ethiopia possesses an official document that can contest the historical water rights held by Egypt and Sudan.
Does the GERD impact Egypt’s water resources?
Egypt’s concerns are rooted not just in maintaining its privileged status among other Nile Basin nations but in the potential effects of the GERD on the country’s water supply. The dam could reduce the annual flow of the Nile, which is crucial for ensuring Egypt’s water security and agricultural needs, as 98% of Egypt’s water comes from the Nile.
The GERD reservoir holds a significant volume of water that was once part of this natural flow. Furthermore, a reduction in river water could lead to increased reliance on groundwater sources, risking depletion in the Nile Delta region. The GERD may also complicate Egypt’s water management by disrupting the traditional operational schedule of the Aswan High Dam.
However, the seasonal filling of the GERD reservoir, which has occurred five times so far, has not adversely affected Egypt’s water availability. The country has long been below the threshold of water poverty (estimated at 1,000 cubic meters per person per year). While per capita water availability dropped over 10% from 550 cubic meters in 2022 to 500 cubic meters in 2025, this decline coincided with a population surge from 104 million to 119 million people (as of November 2025) during the same period, suggesting that it had nothing to do with the GERD.
Some studies indicate that the operation of the GERD could exacerbate water shortages in Egypt, particularly during extended droughts when rapid reservoir filling occurs; however, experts believe such scenarios will be rare.
Egypt’s water resources are effectively managed by the Aswan High Dam, and paradoxically, Ethiopia could inflict harm on Egypt only if it were to maintain the GERD Reservoir at a low level.
The Nile’s water resources are not the sole issue straining relations between the two nations. Egypt is also wary of Addis Ababa’s ambitions to secure access to the sea through neighboring countries, particularly Somalia. A 2024 agreement between Ethiopia and the unrecognized state of Somaliland, allowing Addis Ababa to utilize the port of Berbera, brought the entire region to the brink of war.
Hidden benefits for Sudan
Egypt’s stance is clear. However, for Sudan the GERD project presents an opportunity to address its own water challenges, which include seasonal flooding and the fragility of its irrigation infrastructure.
While he publicly supported Egypt’s position and criticized Ethiopia, Sudanese leader al-Burhan failed to mention that in October 2022, he signed a technical agreement with Addis Ababa regarding the filling and operation of the GERD. Al Jazeera reported this in April 2025, citing its sources.
The agreement, which may have been concluded unbeknownst to Egypt, includes Ethiopia’s commitment to gradually fill the dam during the rainy season – from July to October of each year – until the water level reaches 625 meters, while also allowing for reservoir reductions in times of drought. This arrangement aims to protect Sudan’s Roseires Dam and mitigate the severe flooding that typically affects Sudan from July to October.
The agreement also establishes a permanent operational level for the GERD between 625 and 640 meters above sea level. Additionally, Ethiopia must release at least 300 cubic meters of water per second to Sudan, to ensure a continuous flow of the Blue Nile and maintain the ecological balance. To oversee these conditions, a special coordination committee has been formed.
Interestingly, Sudan is also looking to Russia for solutions to its water issues. Participating in the Russian Energy Week 2025, Sudanese Minister of Energy Al-Mutasim Ibrahim noted that around 60% of Sudan still suffers from a critical electricity shortage.
He indicated that Sudan aims to partner with Russia to expand its energy production through strategic projects in nuclear and renewable energy. The minister expressed hope for receiving technical support from Russia to develop the country’s hydropower sector and “increase the capacity of [Sudan’s] hydropower dams.”
He also addressed the situation surrounding the GERD. “We are looking forward to resolving the outstanding issues surrounding the Renaissance Dam through dialogue and collective operation. We need to sit together and agree on how to operate it in a way that serves the interests of all the bordering countries, such as Egypt, Sudan, and others,” Ibrahim said.
Ethiopia’s triumph
The grand opening of the GERD did not spark the large-scale conflict that regional and international analysts had warned about over the past decade. Apparently, the bellicose rhetoric of the past has faded away. If, in 2020, US President Donald Trump’s remark that Egypt would “blow up the dam” seemed quite realistic, presently Egypt has adopted a restrained stance.
Egypt is now actively planning for the future and developing extensive water desalination initiatives with the GERD in mind. Meanwhile, Sudan, like many other Nile Basin countries, has found a way to benefit from Ethiopia’s ambitious project.
For Ethiopia, the success of the GERD is not only a significant achievement, but also a challenge. Addis Ababa has defied its neighbors and fulfilled a long-held dream; moreover, the project has been primarily funded by the Ethiopian people and government. Now, the choices made by the Ethiopian authorities will determine whether they can leverage the dam for genuine regional integration that benefits not only Ethiopia but also other nations across Africa.