Stalin will return to Moscow streets on Victory Day
Published: 05 March, 2010, 14:46
Edited: 06 May, 2010, 17:41
TAGS: Anniversary, Scandal, Russia, Politics, Stalin, History
A war of words over the name of Joseph Stalin, who died 57 years ago, is being fought in Moscow, the city where he is buried. The country he led to victory in World War II is still divided over Stalin's place in history.
Even the Russian government cannot decide which side to take – Stalin the great hero, or Stalin the evil villain.
Ahead of the May 9 Victory Day celebrations, this longstanding discussion is literally taking to the streets of Moscow.
Posters bearing the image of history's most polarizing Soviet leader are expected to be part of the holiday decorations, as a vivid reminder of Stalin's role in the Nazis’ defeat.
“I'm not an admirer of Stalin,” declared Moscow mayor Yury Luzhkov, “but I am an admirer of objective history.” The mayor also said that of two thousand billboards decorating the city on the Victory Day only ten one by one-and-a-half meter posters will bear the image of Stalin.
Such a statement is a weak argument for human rights groups. They have been fast to accuse Moscow's authorities of distorting history, reviving the cult of personality and glorifying tyranny. They say that for objectivity they will hang banners with another historic truth about Stalin.
“The truth is that Stalin is responsible for murdering millions of innocent people and ruining the lives of many others in labor camps,” the oldest member of the Moscow Helsinki Group, Lyudmila Alekseeva, stated in response. “I'm not an extremist or a hooligan, but I will throw eggs and tomatoes at Stalin's pictures if they appear. This is offensive to all those who died in the war!”
Memorial also announced the plans to print alternative posters and place them in Moscow streets on Victory day. These posters will describe the damage inflicted to the Soviet Union by Stalin’s staff policy, especially in the military field, as well as by foreign policy decisions.
![]() image from davno.ru |
“He was a genius, a strong military commander. Without him we'd never have seen victory!” said Ivan Slukhay of the Moscow Veteran Committee. “He was the man who was able to mobilize resources to win the war and to modernize the country. To develop it when the war was over. We can't forget that!”
And while Russia's official position says we cannot forget, we cannot forgive either. Both the President and Prime Minister of Russia have repeatedly stressed that this is the case when the cost did matter and the goal, even if it was victory in a world war, could not be justified by the means.
Historian Sergey Kudryashov tells RT that sheer ignorance and lack of information leads to the glorification of Stalin.
“There are still plenty of documents classified in Russian archives and I think the more documents we have about his activities,” Kudryashov says, “the more visible image of the man we shall have.”
“Many people do know about terrible famine of the 1930s in the southern parts of Russia and in Ukraine, but very few people know that there was big famine in Russia itself in 1947,” the historian continued, while adding that many people think that more than two million people died in Russia immediately after the war.
“I think the more we know about Stalin, the less we shall glorify this particular man,” Kudryashov concluded.
Josef Stalin's grave sits next to the Kremlin's walls in the very heart of Moscow, together with other politicians and military commanders of the Soviet era. This might be taken in itself as recognition of his achievements, but still more than half a century after his death, Stalin's legacy remains the most controversial in Russian history.He will always be remembered as the man who brought the country victory in war, but this heroic image will never be separated from another, that of a bloody-minded tyrant who brought more suffering to his people than any other Soviet leader.
05.03.2010, 14:38
1 comment
Gordon Brown faces grilling over Iraq warBritish Prime Minister Gordon Brown has insisted that the decision to invade Iraq was correct, giving testimony in an official inquiry into what role he played in Britain’s decision to follow America into war. |
Sumo wrestler stole 90 kg payment terminalMoscow police were hot on the trail of two perpetrators who snatched a payment terminal from a shop. One of them turned out to be sumo wrestler, a guy capable of carrying a device weighting 90 kilos on his back. |
It makes no difference why Stalin murdered, whether for racial reasons or for ethnic reasons, or for any other reason one might imagine. The fact is, that he murdered – and murdered and murdered, until he became one of the greatest mass murders known to human kind, whose name and whose deeds will forever shame the pages of human history. While not a Russian himself, he did this in the name of the Soviet Russian imperialism, as well as in the name of his own sick paranoia. And he did not commit his multiple millions of murders, and ever greater multiple millions of enslavements, by himself. He had untold thousands of accomplices, and so did his successors who continued in his oppressive ways and whose only claim to fame is that they did not murder, enslave or terrorize quite so many as their mentor. It is to Russia’s profound shame that it has lifted not one finger even to investigate, much less prosecute and sentence, even one single individual who committed crimes against humanity in the name of the Soviet state. Never mind what Germany or any other nation did nor did not do – their actions or lack of it do not even begin to relieve Russia of its comprehensive moral bankruptcy in regard to its handling of its Soviet legacy.
It would seem the difference is that Stalin killed on ideological differences, vs ethnic, and that the USSR won, whereas Germany had lost. Stalin did not explicitly aim to completely wipe out any particular ethnic group, but rather killed anyone who dared oppose him and/or communism. That even post-Stalin Soviet leadership criticised Stalin, and reversed the cult following of Stalin should make it clear that the USSR and later on, Russian criticisms of Stalin, that his footsteps are being avoided, rather than followed. Obama, nor did any US President, did not offer any apologies for the treaties, for the mass murder of buffalo to starve midwestern natives into submission. Obama has not acknowledged the wrongs committed. The document was signed as part of a defence spending bill. No press release was issued on the bill. Apologies have been made to African Americans, to Japanese Americans with press releases. No one told any Native leaders of it. It was not directed at any. That isn't exactly an apology, much less any attempts at corrective measures. It is one very small step in the right direction. In Vietnam, bounties were given for VC brought dead. An American cavalry officer even commented that a pregnant woman counted as two dead; one VC and one cadet. Deliberate bombing of civilian casualties. List goes on, including the previous examples I have mentioned already. As far as I am concerned, Germany apologised for the Holocaust because it had no choice to. It has not apologised otherwise for other crimes of aggression committed. It has whitewashed its own history of colonialism. It only apologised in 2004 for specific acts of genocide Germany committed because 2004 was the 100th anniversary of them and enough media jumped onboard to make it an issue. The apology was met with widespread criticism of what was deemed to be caving in. It always apologies for things it cannot effectively sweep under the carpet, and nothing more.













Oh I will mind Germany and every other nation that whitewashes its own history of as much terror and death and destruction they have caused to others at the same time as laying blame of the actions of one man and those under his authority solely on that of one nation as much as possible. It doesn't make anyone right, but it sure as hell drops their morale ground right about at the same level. There are VERY few examples indeed of a nation prosecuting one of its own on its own for crimes committed against another state. Oh, you would like that, would you not? To remove the background. To turn it into black and white. To meld Russia with the USSR no matter what. Well, guess what? Stalin wasn't a Russian. Stalin took control of the entire USSR. Stalin signed off on every order of rape, pillage, torture, and mass murder. Everyone else followed his orders. The hierarchy of the Ukrainian Socialist Republic followed his orders to the letter. Those people were Ukrainians. You would love to pretend it was only "Soviet Russians" that were to blame, and Stalin just happened to be ethnically Georgian and nothing else, but even the Russian Soviet endured its share of crimes committed against it by Stalin. Or did you happen to forget Russian suffered untold amounts under Stalin as well? No, I suppose that wouldn't fit in your rhetoric and demonising of Russia. Tito was the President of Yugoslavia from post-WW2 to 1980, at his death. He committed numerous massacres, and prejudiced heavily against Serbs. He was half-Croat, and half-Slovene. He was born in what was then a part of the Austro-Hungarian empire. Serbia is the recognised successor state to Yugoslavia. No one has attempted to take him to trial after his death. No one. And he's guilty of many a crime. Who prosecutes him? Serbia? Croatia? Slovenia? Austria? No one criticises Serbia for not doing so. No one claims he pushed forward some Serbian imperialist agenda. No, this is Russophobia and hatred at its best.