&host=www.rt.com&uri=/news/stalin-grandson-newspaper-lawsuit/&via=1.1 205.128.88.17:80 (Footprint 4.8/FPMCP)&ua=CCBot/1.0 (+http://www.commoncrawl.org/bot.html))
“Bloodthirsty cannibal”: Stalin’s grandson locks horns with newspaper in court
Published: 09 October, 2009, 00:17
Edited: 03 January, 2010, 19:53
TAGS: Scandal, Russia, Mass media, Stalin
Moscow’s Basmanny court has begun hearing a ten million rouble libel lawsuit filed by Stalin’s grandson, Evgeny Dzhugashvili, against Novaya Gazeta newspaper that called his grandfather “a bloodthirsty cannibal.”
The opinion piece by Anatoly Yablokov, published in a special edition of the Novaya Gazeta on June 22, detailed the Katyn massacre, the mass killings of Polish prisoners by the infamous NKVD.
As Nadezhda Prosenkova, a spokesperson for Novaya Gazeta told the media, the article was based upon recently declassified documents from which it reported that Stalin personally signed orders to execute people and then forwarded the orders to the NKVD to carry out.
In the course of the hearing, plaintiffs’ lawyer Yury Mukhin said he doesn’t think that Stalin single-handedly ordered repressions against innocent people.
As for the defendants’ side, they said that to their mind the article under question contained only subjective judgments. In particular, the author has expressed his personal assessment of Stalin as a political figure, saying that “Stalin and the NKVD were bonded by blood” and “the former father of the people was a bloodthirsty cannibal.”
The defendants argue that those evaluations have been based upon general truths which can be found in all modern history school books.
“I peppered the plaintiffs with simple questions like, What part of the article do they think is libelous? Are they aware of some universally accepted facts? Do they know Gorbachov, Yeltsin and Putin all condemned the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact? Have they seen official reports of the Soviet era accusing Stalin of atrocities?” commented Henry Reznik, the defendants’ lawyer.
“Also, I asked them if they thought the author was the first one to call Stalin a “blood-thirsty cannibal.” Don’t they realize this is a generally accepted description used in numerous works? The reason I do this is because, according to the Civil Procedure Code, you don’t need to provide evidence for generally accepted facts,” he told journalists.
The defendants also said they are planning to present execution orders signed by Stalin to the court, along with some of the known documents from the Katyn case.
Some procedural matters were decided upon on Thursday and the plaintiffs’ side have presented their case. Besides, the court has established that the sides are not going to come to an amicable agreement.
The court is expected to rule on the lawsuit on Friday.
08.10.2009, 22:30
13 comments
Russian race crime role reversal – ethnic group sentencedA Moscow court has delivered its verdict in the case of two Russian students attacked by a gang of ethnic minorities. Six defendants were sentenced to 4-7 years in prison for being part of the Black Hawks gang. |
09.10.2009, 01:20
“Obama wants it both ways in Afghanistan”With public support for the campaign for a massive troop surge in Afghanistan at an all-time low, President Obama hopes to find a compromise between the Democrats and Republicans, says political editor Chris Stirewalt. |
Are we really trying to find a "good" side to Stalin? Every imaginable mismanagement, and atrocity occurred under his administration. Weather he personally ordered a given action or simply failed to punish it, he's still responsible. Not to mention the accusations of mistrials, show trials, abductions, and arbitrary destruction of careers. Given that both Hitler and Mao Zedong both admired and adopted some of Stalin's methods, I feel it was his regime that contributed most to the failure of the Soviet experiment, and Communism as a whole. Yes, of course there were accomplishments during that time as well. But were they because of Stalin and his agents, or in spite of them? If Lenin or Trotsky were in control, would things not have gone somewhat smother? Somewhat more efficiently? At least would Western Propagandists not have had a harder time with a milder, more flexible approach to the ideology?
Not Surprised that with the triumph of counter- revolution , will be ushered in Russia an epoch of villification against heroes of the great October socialist revolution - Stalin, Dzedjinski, Panfilov etc . Please yourselves how you may, in your Hatred of the formost communists, heap what insults as you wish on them in unison with the real enemies of mankind-imperialism- As the best of the human Species, communists the world over remain unshaken in the view that comrade Stalin had not erred in the execution of his sacred duties to the Working class of the USSR or the World in General. The current attacks are the treacherous continuation of the ideological and political class struggle that cannot be wished away in the unward match of human history. I do hope RT will however, see fit to post my opposing position to M6 , the most rabid exponent of the ideas of the exploiting class . Many thanks from Ibarruri.