Russia voices concern over Iran’s missile tests
Published: 29 September, 2009, 15:17
Edited: 30 September, 2009, 17:00
An image grab taken from Iran's English-language state-owned Press TV channel on September 28, 2009 shows an Iranian medium-range Shahab-3 missile before being fired in desert terrain at an unspecified location in the Islamic republic (AFP Photo/ HO / Press TV)
(5.4Mb) embed videoTAGS: Arms, Nuclear, Russia, Middle East
Iran’s missile tests cause concern, Russia’s Foreign Minister, Sergey Lavrov, has said. He has also called on Tehran to closely cooperate with the IAEA regarding its nuclear ambitions.
"This is not banned by any international treaties. Of course, when missile launches accompany an unresolved situation surrounding the Iranian nuclear programme, this causes concern," Sergey Lavrov said.
Further, Sergey Lavrov has urged Iran to fully answer questions related to recent revelations about a second uranium enrichment facility in the country. The comments came after Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s meeting with his Iranian counterpart, Manouchehr Mottaki, at the United Nations.
“Our meeting was mainly devoted to the situation with Iran’s nuclear issue ahead of talks in Geneva,” Lavrov said.
Six-party talks, involving the United States, Russia, Great Britain, China, South Korea and Japan, plus Iran, are scheduled for October, 1.
“And in this context, we presented our stance on the matter and called for maximum cooperation so the IAEA can fully sort out the issue of a second nuclear facility and so it will be possible to start solving all the questions that can remain in the agency regarding Iran and, by that, start solving Iran’s nuclear issue in general,” Lavrov added.
Read also China's Growing Nuclear Arsenal To Be Balanced with US Hypersonic Missiles
Medvedev checks out unique underwater rifleWhile on a visit to a naval base in Russia’s western enclave of Kaliningrad, President Medvedev tested the latest masterpiece of Russian gunsmiths – a rifle that can shoot almost as well in water as above ground. |
29.09.2009, 15:54
5 comments
Moscow considers joint missile shield with NATOMoscow is against NATO's anti-missile system becoming part of the US shield, but will consider the idea of Russia and NATO forming a “missile umbrella”, according to Russia’s NATO envoy Dmitry Rogozin. |
I find it interesting that Iran test-fired Shahab-3 missiles on Yom Kippur, one of the holiest days on the Jewish calendar. Iran is obviously provoking Israel. To offer sanctions on Iran is a total waste of time. This will only give the Iranians time to build longer range missiles to hit cities in Europe. Russia and the rest of Europe needs to be concerned of this, when they meet in Geneva with the United States. It's time for NATO and Russia to build a joint missle shield together.
Peter, Israel is already a nuclear power. And no, they cannot use nukes on Iran because Iran borders 4 former Soviet states, Russia will not just sit and watch while Armenia, etc are being exposed to radiation. There is nothing in international law that says you can't have nuclear power stations and there is nothing in international law that says you cannot test your own missiles. Israel needs to stop using Iran as an excuse for continuing their occupation of Palestine.












Iolo - Spot on, Israel don't have any military options. If they don't use nukes they are in the end to be over run. If they do, they will be imemdiately over run. That is why the only solution for Israel is a political one. The military solution will not work forever, that is the simple fact. It is a mere patch on the problem. Others really don't understand nuclear weapons at all. They are a guaranteed loss maker. Their use is only to prevent a victor, they will not make a victor. They only make losers that deny the victor. Then a big cat comes along afterwards and eats up the frail mice. So a real step forward is to remove the nuclear weapons from the middle east as part of the stated world wide aims of the security council. The weapons have no real value in securing the state of Israel, they just have mass killing capability, which if used against civilian targets would be a war crime. A white phosphorous times a million scenario. The only way forward in the middle east is to guarantee human saftey and rights of all peoples equally by the international community. Then walk the long and difficult political process to arrive at a lasting solution. Such a process needs to be without pre-conditions or western terrorist threats. There are always the armchair generals, the ones eager for a fight, the same ones hiding under the table when war visits their lounge and threatens their X-box.