Activist says NATO could turn on rebels
Published: 03 September, 2011, 23:38
Edited: 04 September, 2011, 15:05
Tripoli: A mural showing former Libyan strongman Moamer Kadhafi hanging from the gallows is painted on a wall in downtown Tripoli on September 2, 2011. (AFP Photo / Francisco Leong)
(77.2Mb) embed videoTAGS: Oil, Arms, Conflict, Military, NATO, UN, Politics, Bill Dod, Resources, Libya, Gaddafi, War
Documents found in Tripoli have pointed to close co-operation between Gaddafi's regime and Western intelligence agencies. Activist Marinella Correggia says it is no surprise that countries which had ties to Gaddafi have turned against him.
“It is the common politics of Western powers – they do what they think is better for them,” said Correggia, an activist with Ecopeace. “The biggest US enemy, Osama bin Laden, was their friend at the beginning, in Afghanistan. Italy relied on the Libyan regime against Islamist groups. Now they think they can control these Islamist groups because they gave them military support and money. Now the West prefers to side with Islamist and racist groups.”
Correggia also maintained that we might see NATO turn against the rebels if they do not fulfill expectations.
“NATO will put pressure on the rebels because they are very much dependant on NATO and the West,” she explained. “They will threaten them, they will not give them enough money.”
The new Libyan leadership announced that work should resume at two oil fields by next week; five foreign companies already work the fields. Libya's future relies on getting that industry in full swing again, and it has to have some external help. But according to Correggia, it will soon change.
“Now the [new Libyan leadership] can have a much better deal, there will be a lot of fighting between Western powers,” she said. “The main Italian newspaper said Italy did not do enough in the war and France will profit more. This is a dirty war. And it is not yet over.”
She also stated that oil revenues did indeed go to the Libyan people during Gaddafi’s rule.
“I’ve been to Libya, they have good houses and food; a lot of money was going to African countries for Africa’s development,” she said. “Oil revenues were distributed, but I doubt it will continue to happen.”
03.09.2011, 22:39
3 comments
Gas dispute flares up between Moscow and KievRussia will not revise its gas agreement with Ukraine and may defend it in court, vowed President Dmitry Medvedev’s spokeswoman, Natalia Timakova. |
04.09.2011, 01:15
13 comments
Epoch-making protests rock IsraelHundreds of thousands of anti-government protesters have taken to the streets of Israeli cities demanding “social justice.” The rally has already been called the largest in the history of the Jewish state. |
Democracy is a joke.
It's all about the money, the government is nothing more then legalized mafia.
You are free but you have to pay taxes, voluntary, or you get clubbed to death.
If NATO cared about democracy in Libya they would talk first or at least try to talk, and I don't recall them even trying. I do recall Khadaffy asking for talks, but hey, don't talk with criminals...
I like to see the world in an evolving way, and like Victor Hugo said; “You can resist an invading army; you cannot resist an idea whose time has come.”
If western countries like him [rebel forces], they will support him [rebel forces].
If they do not like him [rebel forces in the Libya], they will give him good lessons about messing with western countries.
It is what all about western countries of their foreign policies toward other countries.
Most of the Asia countries learn from good lessons about how western countries of their foregin policies.










Both comments are correct. Observers are saying that this campaign is all about getting Western hands on Libyan Oil. It is as simple as that. Bleak future for Libyans. But you asked for it much as I despise Gaddafi. Sort yourselves out!