IAC knew that the truth would be unpalatable – aviation expert
Despite the fact that the Intestate Aviation Committee (IAC) delivered its final report on the tragedy near Smolensk in January 2011, some Polish opposition politicians refuse to accept its main conclusion – that responsibility for the plane crash lies mostly with the Polish pilots operating the plane. The Polish politicians argue that Russian air traffic controllers should share a portion of the blame.
David Learmount from Flight Global magazine, an expert on aviation issues, argues that for anyone in the aviation it was “a simple aviation accident”.
“The pilots broke the procedure rules that they should have stopped for safety. They went lower than they knew they should have done, but only because they felt under such a high pressure to deliver such important people to such an important event,” says Learmount. “The visibility was way below limits to make a safe landing possible. The controllers told the pilots; the pilots knew they should not be even trying an approach, but they said they were going to do an attempted approach just to see what it was like. They were not cleared to land.”
Learmount does not doubt the IAC’s report, the IAC being a highly respected commission internationally. “The report into this particular accident was really thorough, indeed. It is quite clear when you read it that they were well aware of the fact that the truth was going to be unpalatable, it was going to be not at all popular with a lot of people in Poland. And that is how it has turned out,” says Learmount.
Learmount says proper decisions had every chance to be taken, with two other flights diverting from the airport an hour earlier due to the same reason of poor visibility. Still, an event like this one is such a tragedy for Poland that people just do not want to see the truth. It is an absolute goldmine for conspiracy theorists, Learmount believes.
David Kaminski-Morrow, an aviation journalist, says it will be hard for Poland to come up with totally different findings in October, when they finish their own probe.
Their results will depend on “if Poland wants to start with the evidence and finish with the conclusion or whether it wants to start with the conclusion and then charily pick the evidence. The facts of this case are fairly unequivocal. It would take a fairly elaborate reinterpretation of an awful lot of hard factual data to come up with an alternative to what the IAC has already published,” says the journalist.
Kaminski-Morrow believes that had it been other than the presidential flight, the report would have been accepted without further doubts. But the fact that the flight carrying the elite of the country ended up in a thousand pieces in a forest is not an easy pill for the Polish side to swallow, thinks Kaminski-Morrow.
Chris Yates, a consultant on aviation safety, says that the fault cannot be shifted to Russia’s air traffic controllers, whose role is to guide and advice those who are in the sky. The final decisions are taken by pilots, who received all the proper warnings of poor visibility conditions at the airport, points out Yates.
“One of the overriding issues that I have thought long and hard about in respect with this crash is why so many high- level delegates from Poland were flying together on the same plane,” says Yates. “It should not have been the case. Common sense itself would dictate that when you have such a large entourage traveling long distances, you separate all these people across two aircrafts in the event that something goes wrong.”