icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm
25 Nov, 2016 02:40

Israeli Supreme Court wants to know why only Palestinian terrorist homes razed & not Jewish

Israeli Supreme Court wants to know why only Palestinian terrorist homes razed & not Jewish

The Israeli High Court of Justice has questioned the state policy of terrorism deterrence and gave the government 30 days to justify razing the homes of Palestinian terrorists, when it does not do the same for Jewish extremists.

The case was brought about by Suha and Hussein Abu Khdeir, the parents of 16-year-old Palestinian Mohammed Abu Khdeir, who was murdered in 2014 in a revenge attack over the kidnapping and murder of three Israeli teenagers.

The government’s current policy is to knock down the houses of Palestinian attackers who have murdered Israelis, as deterrence. But the Khdeir family argued that if this is the case, why does the same not apply to Jews who have murdered Arabs?

“I think if they don’t destroy their houses, this is not a democratic state,” Hussein Abu Khdeir told DW in July. “It’s a state of apartheid, a racist state you cannot live in.”

On Monday, judges from the High Court of Justice, a part of the Israeli Supreme Court, seemed to agree with the Khdeirs.

“What does it matter to me if it is an Arab or a Jew?” Justice Neal Hendel asked, as quoted by Ynetnews. “If we say that we are prepared to employ this policy against a specific group of people and not against another it raises certain problems.”

“It is said that in Arab society there are more supporters and that the deterrence will be infinitely stronger,” said Elyakim Rubinstein, vice president of the High Court. “But still, since there are extremists in Jewish society that have done these kinds of terrible things, even if the deterrence is carried out on the assumption that it will influence a small number of people, it will still save lives.”

In response to the Khdeir family’s original calls for Mohammed’s killers houses to be demolished, the defense ministry said that compared to Palestinian terrorism, Jewish crimes of a similar nature were relatively rare, and there was little point in implementing such a measures for Israelis.

“Considering the extent of serious hate crimes in the Jewish community, the need to use this power does not arise,” government solicitor Ahaz Ben-Ari wrote to the Abu Khdeirs, as quoted by Haaretz.

The same argument was presented at the court hearing on Monday. However, it was rejected by the presiding judges, who maintained that the preservation of human life was the court’s priority.

“If it’s possible to prevent one murder through preventative action, will they do it only after 20 murderous attacks are be carried out?” asked Justice Zvi Zilbertal. “When we’re talking about human life, it is not the quantity that counts.”

“If it can prevent five murders, then it is justified,” Justice Hendel agreed. “It would be justified if it prevented even one such incident.”

Hendel, Rubinstein and Zilbertal then gave the government 30 days to provide a response before making their decision.

The policy of house demolition is a tactic used by Israeli authorities used to deter potential terrorists and suicide bombers by giving their families an incentive to dissuade them from launching attacks. The policy has proven controversial, with Palestinians saying that it amounts to collective punishment.