icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm
18 Aug, 2015 09:55

Top Gun? Simulating a flight in the ‘less than impressive’ F-35 (VIDEO)

Top Gun? Simulating a flight in the ‘less than impressive’ F-35 (VIDEO)

Ever wanted to learn how to fly a fighter jet? This may be as close as you can get to sitting in the cockpit of an F-35. The simulator may become the next must have ‘boy toy,’ but the problem is, the aircraft isn’t actually that good in real life.

The simulator, which started operating in May, can be found at the Luke Air Force Base on the outskirts of Phoenix, Arizona and it certainly looks like the real thing. There are plenty of levers and buttons to press, andif you peek out of the window it looks like you are flying at several thousand feet.

While the pilot may feel invincible inside the simulator, the problem for those behind the controls in real life is that they are more like sitting ducks. Despite costing around $1.4 trillion to develop (or a $100 million each), the F-35 just isn’t very good.

READ MORE: F-35 slammed as 'inferior' to older American & foreign fighters incl. Russia's Su-27, MiG-29

It was slammed in a recent report by US progressive think tank National Security Network, which identified four key areas where the F-35 is lacking: poor maneuverability that makes it vulnerable in dogfights, small internal payload capacity, short operational range and reliance on stealth technology to survive.

“To avoid such a catastrophic outcome, Congress and DOD should begin the process of considering alternatives to a large-scale commitment to the F-35. Staying the present course may needlessly gamble away a sizable margin of American airpower at great expense and unnecessary risk to American lives,” the report stated.

It was meant to be a 5th generation multipurpose fighter that would become the backbone of the US Air Force. However, 4th generation jets from Russia and China are outperforming it.

“Compared to both the Su-27 and the MiG-29, the F-35 is grossly inferior in terms of wing loading (except for the F-35C), transonic acceleration, and thrust-to-weight. All F-35 variants also have significantly lower maximum speeds,” the report added.

Podcasts
0:00
26:13
0:00
24:57