G20 hijacked by scan/drone/bomb Obama Doctrine
Pepe Escobar is the roving correspondent for Asia Times/Hong Kong, an analyst for RT and TomDispatch, and a frequent contributor to websites and radio shows ranging from the US to East Asia. Born in Brazil, he's been a foreign correspondent since 1985, and has lived in London, Paris, Milan, Los Angeles, Washington, Bangkok and Hong Kong. Even before 9/11 he specialized in covering the arc from the Middle East to Central and East Asia, with an emphasis on Big Power geopolitics and energy wars. He is the author of 'Globalistan' (Nimble Books, 2007), 'Red Zone Blues' (Nimble Books, 2007), 'Obama does Globalistan' (Nimble Books, 2009) and a contributing editor for a number of other books, including the upcoming 'Crossroads of Leadership: Globalization and the New American Century in the Obama Presidency' (Routledge). When not on the road, he alternates between Sao Paulo, New York, London, Bangkok and Hong Kong.
Another beneficiary will be assorted mercenaries plying their
trade in the Levant.
The original Russian agenda is a road map towards stimulating “economic growth and job creation.”
Confronted with a horrendous economic scenario - with 90 percent of new jobs in the US qualifying as temporary, low wage and with no benefits - the ‘wag the dog’ response of the Obama administration is to start a new war in Syria to the benefit of, who else, Israel and the House of Saud (who will be picking up the tab).
Talk about the Obama Doctrine reaching new heights.
We make our own reality
For a while, the world was fooled by the notion that the Obama
doctrine – extricating the US from George ‘Dubya’ Bush’s
disastrous wars – would direct the superpower towards a modus
vivendi with a multipolar world. That was a myth.
Add to it another myth; the ‘pivoting to Asia’ –
significantly announced by Obama at the Pentagon – selling the
notion that from now on Washington would focus on containing its
rival for real, Beijing.
Yet most of the ‘pivoting’ so far has been pure hype – as
Beijing quickly noticed. And the Middle East never left the
equation – as the Obama administration kept performing
cataclysmic geopolitical somersaults to finesse its
And what a mess of a doctrine this is. Obama has given his
blessing to every momentary ‘winner’ in Egypt - from the sinister
SCAF (Supreme Council of the Armed Forces) to the Muslim
Brotherhood (MB) and the Sisi military dictatorship.
It has ‘led from behind’ in Libya, when in fact the bombing of
Libya was initiated by AFRICOM and then transferred to NATO (that
is, the African and European arms of the Pentagon).
It reconfigured the Global War on Terror (GWOT) into a
newspeak-laden ‘Overseas Contingency Operations’ (OCO), in fact a
‘kinetic’ shadow war crammed with drones and death squads.
It weaponized hardcore Islamists and even Al-Qaeda offshoots in one country while supporting military goons in another; it solemnly brushed aside real pro-democracy protests (as in Bahrain); and in Syria, after being defied for over two-and-a-half years on the ‘Assad must go’ red line, it’s about to resort to default mode; good ol’ democracy bombed from above.
I have qualified this mess as the indispensable (bombing) nation syndrome – the
benign hymn of the last resort that every ‘idealistic’ US
President is required, sooner or later, to sing.
In Obama’s case, the hymn comes with the requisite Götterdämmerung overtones. We’re talking about the fragile ego of a pampered teenager blown to smithereens because, recklessly, he drew a ‘red line’ without thinking about the serious consequences; and now, afflicted by hubris and terrified of losing face, he’s on a path to deliver some heavy metal.
The narrative is not exactly uplifting; our tormented ‘hero’,
weasel-style, is trying to extricate himself from the
responsibility, stating that ‘US credibility’ is on the line, and
not his own. He seems not to have noticed that US ‘credibility’ –
not to mention US Tomahawk diplomacy – is already shattered all
across the developing world (European poodles, though, bravely
Whatever I say is legal, goes
Before the ‘red line’ fiasco, our Wagnerian lost soul would have profited from the G20 to once more lobby President Putin to extradite a real hero, Edward Snowden. Now he will be lobbying for his puny Tomahawk diplomacy. French President Francois Hollande, self-styled new American attack poodle, is already yapping. Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe may join him. Forget about discussing that pesky global economy.
Yet the majority of the G20 member-nations, from spied-upon Brazil and Mexico to Indonesia and Argentina, not to mention China, find this whole business utterly disgusting. They are very much aware that according to the UN Charter, article 2(4) makes it ILLEGAL for any country to use force or threaten to use force against another country; and article 2(7) makes an intervention in an internal or domestic dispute in another country also ILLEGAL.
The G20 might at least be a platform to discuss secret, serious diplomacy involving the US, Russia, Iran and Saudi Arabia to organize a diplomatic way out, leading to free and fair elections in Syria in 2014. Wait; this process already exists. It’s the Geneva II conference, which has been postponed month after month because the Syrian (armed) opposition refuses to discuss anything.
The Obama Doctrine has bombed not only the current G20 but in fact any possibility of a diplomatic solution for the Syrian tragedy. For starters, Obama obviously never read Sun Tzu. Naïve is an understatement; he telegraphed his move to the ‘enemy’, as in, “Hang in there; my bombs are coming, maybe now, maybe next week.” He said the whole thing would be “limited,” a “slap on the wrist.”
But now the ‘slap’ is morphing into an iron glove, hijacked by the war lobby in Capitol Hill via the Orwellian rhetoric of ‘change the momentum in the battlefield’ – code for what this has always been about from the beginning: regime change.
Bombing one of the oldest cities in the world during a perverse three-month window will do nothing but perpetuate the war (which is, essentially, the Obama administration agenda). The Pentagon never does ‘limited’ or ‘tailored’ stuff. This is going to be a much deadlier version of NATO in Kosovo deployed as the Air Force of the Albanian/Kosovars – then promoted from ‘terrorists’ to ‘freedom fighters’ (just like foreign mercenaries in Syria); NATO wouldn’t be foolish to have Western Europeans as ‘boots on the ground’.
The spin in Brussels is that German Chancellor Angela Merkel – who needs to face an election in two weeks – supported by Camembert attack dog Hollande, has been posing as the middle-woman between Putin and Obama, trying to delay the Tomahawks. That’s the rationale behind the latest BND - German intelligence – report, which contains ‘evidence’ of a dodgy phone call involving a Hezbollah higher-up and the Iranian embassy (presumably in Beirut, though it’s not specified). As if Hezbollah would discuss sensitive information on non-encrypted systems. Putin obviously won’t be convinced by this new ‘evidence’ to drop his support for Assad.
And even while this charade goes on, Moscow has been cleverly
spreading its trade and commercial wings over an economically-
and politically-ravaged Europe. Russia is no less than filling a
US vacuum in Europe – as much as China filled a US vacuum in
Africa before the Pentagon counterpunched with AFRICOM.
Keep your eye on Pipelineistan
By now the different, sometimes converging, agendas of all those
who want war on Syria are crystal clear. Essentially, it’s
‘the road to Damascus ends up in Tehran’.
The War Party in Washington, Israel and the House of Saud all
know that new Iranian President Hassan Rouhani’s success depends
on easing the sanctions and revitalizing the Iranian economy.
Tomahawks falling over Syria will virtually obliterate his push
for a civilized dialogue between Iran and the US; the
ultra-conservatives in Tehran will inevitably regain the upper
So the Obama doctrine, on purpose, is also about bombing any
possibility of meaningful dialogue with Tehran. The proof is that
Obama eagerly listens to rabid Israeli-firsters such as Dennis
Ross, now with the Washington Institute for Near East Policy
(WINEP) think tank. Ross argues that bombing will reinforce the
US’s “credibility” – as in threatening to go medieval
further on down the road to prevent Iran from acquiring those
evil, non-existent nuclear weapons.
And then, of course, there’s Pipelineistan – the elephant in the Syria
frenzy room. There’s a lot of natural gas in the Eastern
Mediterranean near the Syrian and Lebanese shorelines – arguably
90 percent more than in Israel. So Syria is a great prize in
itself – on the road to become a natural gas competitor to Qatar.
Add to it the possibility of completion – post-war – of the $10
billion Iran-Iraq-Syria pipeline. Privileged customers: Western
Europe. Soon Qatar was being blocked on two fronts; by the House
of Saud (who vetoed a pipeline traversing Saudi Arabia) and by
the pipeline traversing Syria.
Thus the alliance with the US (and a privileged partnership with Exxon-Mobil), dependent on destroying any moves towards an Iran-Iraq-Syria pipeline, to the benefit of a Qatar-Syria-Turkey pipeline feeding European natural gas customers. For the US, there’s the extra incentive that such a pipeline would dent Gazprom’s hold over the European gas market.
None of that, of course, will be discussed at the G20; the Obama
doctrine won’t allow it. Quite predictable, when international
relations are prey to a hubristic superpower that still answers
geopolitical challenges with gunboat diplomacy.
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.