The airstrikes were halted a year ago because it was proven, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that the strike targets were opponents of President Saleh, not some militants.  In fact, the mysterious AQAP (Al-Qaeda in Arabian Penninsula) is a Saudi-Yemeni invention.  Money, arms, advisors and airstrikes were the benefits that the regime was receiving for the imaginary enemy.  Saudi Arabia once did not execute an air strike as it became suspicious of Saleh's intelligence. 

Now, that after four long months of killing civilians, tribes have finally called up armed rebellion,  US is again standing up by Saleh.  Tribes were deadly accurate after only three days of military action against regime.  President was wounded and taken to Saudi Arabia.  But his son and heir is still commanding his private army.  Now, US has RESUMED HELPING SALEH's heir stay in power.   Air strikes are against the tribes in the south, as they are most likely to take advantage of Saleh's relinquishing power.  Even if there is going to be a negotiated settlement among the tribes of Yemen proper,  the southern province which was FORCIBLY incorporated into Yemen,  will likely want independance.  No tribes in the north will have any problem with that.  But Saleh will loose his oil fields, and his only source of money for private army and purchase of arms from US.  So, it is US to the rescue, striking anti-Saleh people --- calling them Al-Qaeda. 

What do we have UN for?  If nobody in UN cares to demand the END to air strikes on countries,  then they may as well go home.   What is the point?  US, France, UK and others can just let everyone know by phone which country they feel like "protecting"  via their bombs next, and that will save everyone a lots of money!

Five muslim countries are under attack and muslims are the one who want to kill followers of other religions.Which one is more terrorizing 5 pound bomb from suicide bomber once in a year or even less US or EU, or 1000 pound bombs killing innocents every single day in muslim countries?