VERSIONS: روسيا اليوم NOTICIAS FREEVIDEO ИНОТВ RTД
breakingnews
Go to main page   News   US starts negotiations with Taliban  
MORE ON THE STORY
AFP Photo / Joel Saget 21.01, 20:01 26 comments

Hate and betrayal: Taliban infiltrate Afghan army

The Taliban says it recruited the Afghan soldier who killed four French troops on Friday, increasing fears the country’s rag-tag security forces are turning on their Western backers in the run-up to the planned 2014 NATO troop withdrawal.

Pakistani security personnel examines the site of a bomb blast in Jamrud (AFP Photo / A. MAJEED) 20.01, 20:50 11 comments

Maiming plague: No salvation from Taliban bombs

The home-made bombs used by Taliban insurgents leave their victims with horrible injuries doctors have trouble treating, which inevitably adds to an attack's death toll. And half of those who do survive the initial blast die later in hospitals.

U.S. President Barack Obama at the White House in Washington January 13, 2012 (Reuters / Kevin Lamarque) 17.01, 02:28 67 comments

Obama sued over indefinite detention and torture of Americans act

In the past, journalist Chris Hedges has worked for NPR, The New York Times and the Christian Science Monitor. In his latest endeavor, however, he is teaming up with an unlikely pair: a couple of attorneys that will help him take on the president.

Defense Authorization Act
Pakistani Taliban militants patrol in the Mamouzai area of Orakzai Agency, Pakistan (AFP Photo / Tariq Mahmood) 14.01, 12:35 6 comments

Afghanistan report: ‘CIA and Pentagon arguing on different metrics’

A leaked CIA report says the situation in Afghanistan is mired in a stalemate, contradicting recent optimistic Pentagon statements. Robert Farley of the University of Kentucky believes intelligence and the military are looking at different things.

Pakistani Taliban fighters hold weapons as they receive training in Ladda, South Waziristan tribal region, in this still image taken from a video, shot between December 9 to December 14, 2011 (Reuters / Reuters TV) 13.01, 15:39 26 comments

Secret intel report leaked: US in Afghan dead end

The latest US intelligence report concludes the war against the Taliban has reached an impasse, with the Taliban remaining committed to taking back Afghanistan by force as soon as NATO troops leave the country.

US starts negotiations with Taliban

Published: 29 January, 2012, 14:55
Edited: 30 January, 2012, 15:29

Pakistani Taliban fighters hold weapons as they receive training in Ladda, South Waziristan tribal region, in this still image taken from a video (Reuters / Reuters TV)

(37.2Mb) embed video

TAGS: Meeting, Military, Terrorism, History, Afghanistan, USA, War


Qatar is hosting a pilot round of negotiations between US officials and Taliban representatives, to discuss steps to put an end to the war in Afghanistan, the New York Times reports.

­Unnamed former Taliban officials said that among other issues, the parties would discuss POW transfer from Guantanamo to Qatar.

Kabul expects a delegation from Qatar to visit the Afghan capital to clarify its position in the talks, said High Peace Council Secretary Aminundin Muzaffari.

A delegation of eight Taliban delegates has traveled to Qatar via Pakistan. They are expected to set up a permanent office of the Taliban in Qatar.

The Taliban has not yet provided official comments on the talks, while US officials have not denied the talks are taking place.

The New York Times points out that such talks would be impossible without at least the silent approval of Pakistan. This, in turn, could possibly mean that the discord in American-Pakistani relations caused by recent US strikes on Pakistan’s territory, has softened.

Islamabad now realizes that only through negotiation can it get the US to leave the region, says Khalil Nouri, a co-founder of the think-tank New World Strategies Coalition.

“I really think that Islamabad has been pressured by the international community,” he told RT. “And at the same time, Islamabad must have come up with the idea that, ‘Look, I really think that the only way we can get Americans out of Afghanistan would be to talk to them.’ And once we assure the Americans that everything will be fine and this is the way out, then the Americans will leave and we can all be back to normal.”

However, Sunday’s talks were underscored by a same-day announcement that an Afghan High Peace Council official had been kidnapped by the Taliban in the eastern province of Kunar on Friday.

Mavlawi Shafihullah Shafih, a low-level member of the council, had traveled from Kabul to encourage insurgents to join the nascent peace process in light of the developments in Qatar.

"As soon as he [Shafih] left his car, the Taliban captured him," said Shahzada Shahid, another member of the 70-member council, who went to the Kunar capital of Asadabad in a bid to free Shafih with the aid of community elders, Reuters reports.

Further highlighting the difficulties inherit in the peace process, the BBC reported Sunday that the Afghan government now intends to meet with the Taliban in Saudi Arabia in the coming weeks.  The meeting will preempt the establishment of the Taliban office in Qatar, potentially shifting the focus away from the joint US-Qatari effort.

"Even if the Taliban office is established in Qatar we will obviously pursue other efforts in the region, including Saudi Arabia and Turkey," a senior Afghan government official told the network.

"Saudi Arabia has played an important role in the past. We value that and look forward to continued support and contact with Saudi Arabia in continuing the peace process," he said.

Afghan President Hamid Karzai had previously expressed anger at the US and Qatar move to undercut his authority by pushing ahead with the peace process without fully consulting his government.

The first rumors about the US considering peace talks with the Taliban appeared in October 2010, when President Karzai inaugurated the Afghan High Peace Council of 68 people to help bring some understanding between the Taliban and Kabul.

Back then, the Taliban refused to take part in talks until 152,000 US-led foreign troops leave Afghanistan. Then-NATO commander in Afghanistan, US General David Petraeus refused to fulfill this demand.


embed video

However, Sunday’s talks were underscored by a same-day announcement that an Afghan High Peace Council official had been kidnapped by the Taliban in the eastern province of Kunar on Friday.

Mavlawi Shafihullah Shafih, a low-level member of the council, had traveled from Kabul to encourage insurgents to join the nascent peace process in light of the developments in Qatar.

"As soon as he [Shafih] left his car, the Taliban captured him," said Shahzada Shahid, another member of the 70-member council, who went to the Kunar capital of Asadabad in a bid to free Shafih with the aid of community elders, Reuters reports.

Further highlighting the difficulties inherit in the peace process, the BBC reported Sunday that the Afghan government now intends to meet with the Taliban in Saudi Arabia in the coming weeks.  The meeting will preempt the establishment of the Taliban office in Qatar, potentially shifting the focus away from the joint US-Qatari effort.

"Even if the Taliban office is established in Qatar we will obviously pursue other efforts in the region, including Saudi Arabia and Turkey," a senior Afghan government official told the network.

"Saudi Arabia has played an important role in the past. We value that and look forward to continued support and contact with Saudi Arabia in continuing the peace process," he said.

Afghan President Hamid Karzai had previously expressed anger at the US and Qatar move to undercut his authority by pushing ahead with the peace process without fully consulting his government.

The first rumors about the US considering peace talks with the Taliban appeared in October 2010, when President Karzai inaugurated the Afghan High Peace Council of 68 people to help bring some understanding between the Taliban and Kabul.

Back then, the Taliban refused to take part in talks until 152,000 US-led foreign troops leave Afghanistan. Then-NATO commander in Afghanistan, US General David Petraeus refused to fulfill this demand.

­It will not be easy for the US to pull off these talks as they have to appease Pakistan, Afghanistan and the Taliban at the same time, investigative journalist George Mapp explained in an interview with RT.

All members have to be involved in the talks for there to be any chance of peace,” he insisted. “I can see some backroom deal between Afghanistan and Pakistan, maybe possibly between the Taliban and Afghanistan, and the Taliban and Pakistan separately."

+5 (11 votes)
 
Back to top
next MORE NEWS
Vladimir Putin (L) and presidential candidate and the leader of communist party Gennady Zyuganov (R) (AFP Photo / Natalia Kolesnikova) 29.01, 13:05 57 comments

‘Russian runoff could bring unforeseen results’

If Vladimir Putin doesn’t win the presidency in the first round, he may face Communist leader Zyuganov with unpredictable results, says Anatoly Chubais, head of Russia’s hi-tech state corporation Rosnano and father of privatization in the 1990s.

Election 2012
A Heron TP, also known as the IAI Eitan (Reuters / Gil Cohen Magen) 29.01, 16:20 18 comments

Israeli superdrone crashes and explodes (VIDEO)

The Israeli unmanned aerial vehicle Heron TP, also known as the IAI Eitan, has crashed during a test flight near the Tel Nof airbase, south of Tel Aviv.

slk January 30, 2012, 17:49
-1

The appeasement with the Taliban (with the help of Qatar that also helped deliver the Libyan "democratic revolution") cannot in practice come otherwise than at the expense of the Karzai government, and, of course, Karzai knows it. In a word, Karzai is on his way of becoming a martyr.

In Mugabe we trust January 30, 2012, 12:33
-1

Talking to the USA which is an horrible nation bent on terror in the world  is a waste of time. these terrorist want to own other nations and that is how they are able to live the god like life they live. keep fighting them until they leave afghanistan. 

M Kowalski January 30, 2012, 08:39
-1

@ valmath1

Yeah and the US didn't lose in Vietnam either eh? Face the reality that your heroes have been defeated in Afghanistan as in Iraq. In Iraq they were supposed to never leave and never offer a date for withdrawal but after years of losing ever more men to the resistance, after Petraeus came in he decided under the cover of a 'surge' to give in to all the Iraqi resistance demands, giving a date for withdrawal and removing troops from the streets back to their bases along with paying the resistance hundreds of millions of dollars to stop attacking them and for training. The Iraqis accepted the US need to save face and take their time in withdrawing as why lose more life than necessary? After this the number of US atrocities and 'accidental' killings dropped substantially.

Now the US is trying the same tactic in Afghanistan, probably going to  give the Taliban everything they want in exchange for a lessening of attacks and a chance to withdraw with 'honor'. Personally they deserve to be chased out in coffins until the end, but why should Afghans lose more of their lives if it can be done more peacefully?