VERSIONS: روسيا اليوم NOTICIAS FREEVIDEO ИНОТВ RTД
breakingnews
Go to main page   News   UNfriendly talks: Security Council battles over Syria  
MORE ON THE STORY
Syria, Damascus: Deputy Arab League Seretary General Samir Seif al-Yazal inspects with a group of Arab observers the site of a suicide attack, which targeted the Syrian General Intelligence headquarters, in Damascus on December 23, 2011. (AFP Photo / Louai Beshara) 23.12.2011, 22:33 4 comments

‘Sabotage’ blasts in Damascus: Arab League mission doomed from the start?

The explosions in the heart of Syria were an attempt to force the Syrian regime to clamp down on protesters before the very eyes of the Arab League Observers, who are just beginning their peacekeeping mission, journalist Ibrahim Alloush told RT.

Syria unrest
People gather around the entrance of a damaged building after a car bomb blew up at security sites in Damascus December 23, 2011 (Reuters / Sana) 24.12.2011, 09:39

Syria faces a Christmas of blood and fear

The Christian world is getting ready for Christmas, but there’s little festive spirit in Syria as its capital recovers from two suicide blasts which left over 40 people dead and more than 100 injured.

Locals inspect a damaged house in the Libyan coatal town of Zliten, 150 kilometres (95 miles) east of Tripoli, that a government official said was destroyed in a NATO aerial attack in which a mother and two children were killed on August 4, 2011.( AFP Photo / Imed Lamloum) 23.12.2011, 18:36 32 comments

Russian push to investigate Libyan civilian deaths 'cheap stunt' – US

As Russia submits a draft resolution on Syria to the UN Security Council, Washington’s response to a call by Moscow for an investigation into civilian deaths in Libya raises some eyebrows over the question of human rights.

Libyan conflict

UNfriendly talks: Security Council battles over Syria

Published: 24 December, 2011, 12:12

Reuters / Eric Thayer

Reuters / Eric Thayer

TAGS: Conflict, NATO, UN, Politics, Syria


As a new draft resolution on Syria is put before the UN security council, Russia’s envoy to the international body has lashed out at some other members over missing a crucial chance to stop a looming civil war there.

Vitaly Churkin said on Friday that the ongoing violence could have been calmed several months ago, if “all the Security Council members and all leading international players acted in accordance with”the August statement by the council’s chair, which called on all parties to the Syrian conflict to abstain from violence.

Russia’s envoy to the UN pointed to Bahrain and Yemen as two examples where the international community had promoted national dialogue and eventually managed to quash the violence.

“Unfortunately, Syria was instead chosen as a target for regime change, which brought it close to a civil war which threatens very serious consequences for the region and the Syrian people,” the Russian diplomat stressed.

Russia has submitted a new version of a draft resolution on Syria to the UN Security Council. The document is now the focus of a serious debate within the world’s top security body. Russia is adamant that certain points of the draft resolution which Western members of the council want changed, must be preserved.

Chief among them is a paragraph “mentioning violence stemming from the extremist opposition,” which Churkin said must be retained, otherwise the resolution would be one-sided.

In addition, Moscow has refused to support an arms embargo which forms part of an Arab League-sponsored peace roadmap which President Bashar Assad’s government signed this week. Churkin said that “in practice it would mean, as we have witnessed in Libya, that arms would not be supplied to the government, but will be supplied to various opposition groups.”

German Ambassador Peter Wittig said the latest Russian draft did not go far enough in satisfying the demands of the Western powers.

“So far the Russian draft, the Russian suggestions, are insufficient,” he told the media. “We need to put the weight of the council behind the Arab League, behind all the decisions of the Arab League.”

Syria is among Russia’s major trade partners and in particular buys advanced Russian arms. Critics say this is what prompts Moscow to defend the current Syrian regime. At the same time during the Libyan conflict NATO members supplied arms to rebel forces in violation of the UN arms embargo. Assad’s government says the ongoing violence in the country is provoked by bandits, who use arms smuggled from abroad.

The latest wrangling at the UN Security Council comes a day after member states clashed over the way NATO handled its bombing campaign in Libya. Russia called for an additional investigation under the council’s aegis of alleged atrocities committed by NATO. The US called it a “cheap stunt” to distract attention from Syria and undermine “the success of NATO and its partners” in Libya.

+7 (7 votes)
 
Back to top
next MORE NEWS
The American occupation of Iraq saw the fall of the Ba'athist regime, the capture and execution of its deposed leader, Saddam Hussein, and the establishment of a democratic government. But now, nearly nine years later, is the country any better off? (AFP Photo / Khalil Al-Murshidi) 24.12.2011, 10:42 6 comments

Birth pangs: Iraq emerges from years of occupation

The withdrawal of US troops from Iraq has left a wave of sectarian violence in its wake. The US says it left a stable country. But it seems that even the largest oil reserves in the world are not enough to purchase the peace Iraqis crave.

With the Libya campaign seen as mission accomplished, Britain reiterates it is eyeing another conflict-torn African country – Somalia. (AFP Photo / Carl de Souza) 24.12.2011, 13:59 15 comments

Intervention tension: UK eyes ‘failed state’ Somalia

With the Libya campaign seen as mission accomplished, Britain reiterates it is eyeing another conflict-torn African country – Somalia. The UK cites threats to its national security, but some analysts say this hides a self-interested strategic agenda.

Nay Lin Maung December 28, 2011, 03:48
+1

Every time when western countries do not do or can not do what they [western countries] want to accomplish, they [western countries] are looking for somebody to blame.

 

 

Muslim Tunisian December 26, 2011, 13:49
+1

I do agree to the idea that western people are brainwashed (most of them) ... but still the majority of eastern is brainwashed to in the same way. Eastern are not smarter than western ... they do have a political doctrine about how good and Christian is the west ... and you do believe same thing but in your very particular way. For Us, you bought fought against Islam and Muslims and still doing so. For Us, America is going against Muslim land just like the soviet empire did. For Us, u.s administration is looking for it's own interest and the interest of Israel ...just like the russian administration is looking for own. Russia is changing facts about what is going on in Arab lands and propagating false understanding of Arab revolutions. Anyone who believe that Libya, Syria and every Arab land except Tunisia -already done- does not need revolution is just a fool and wise wannabe. I advice you people to look into your own problems, into your own social and economic collapsing, into your aging population and not let go of the doctrine of power and superiority because you are all going to collapse. americans but you too. You messed around too much through the last 100 years all of you and you are no wonder driving right into a wall.

kolokot December 24, 2011, 23:12
+1

Rickortreat :"Syria is falling apart from the inside, just as a number of Arab states have. They are all moving towards Democracy influenced by American television and American ideas like human rights and leaders elected by their people- something Russia still seems to have a problem with, based on the protests there!" - your definition "from inside" obviously includes Washington DC. This is not that bad,however. The real nonsense comes from the tone and vocabulary of your comment. It is almost scary to notice how much brainwashed the Westerners, in general, and specifically Americans are. You may think that you are speaking your mind, but in reality, you repeat what the media want you to say. No critical thinking present. Colours are either black or white. Good and Bad Guys type of simplifications, easily, not unlike the baby food itself, swallowed. No thinking/chewing needed. Discussing the issue of Syria with people like you is impossible, because how one could discuss anything with a tv set?