Escaping to Shell for shale
Published: 03 September, 2011, 10:24
TAGS: Conflict, Russia, Ukraine, Politics, Aleksey Yaroshevsky, Marina Dzhashi, Prices, Gas
Kiev and Moscow have failed to find common ground on their gas deals. Now, Ukraine has set its sights on an alternative pipeline system to reduce its energy dependence on Moscow.
Back in 2009, an energy dispute between Kiev and Moscow led to Ukraine blocking the transit of Russian gas through its territory and disrupting European energy supplies. The dispute was resolved and the continent heaved a collective sigh of relief.
But the issue has remained a thorn in Kiev’s side. It is pushing hard for a discount from the current market price of US $400 for 1,000 cubic meters.
“We made ourselves clear – if they want cheaper gas, then integrate with us into a common economic space,” Russia’s president Dmitry Medvedev commented. “If they don’t want that, then give us a good commercial offer – like selling their gas transportation system to us. They don’t want any of those, only discounts.”
However, it seems Kiev is already looking for an alternative escape route.
It has signed a US$800-million contract with Royal Dutch Shell to explore its reserves of shale gas. But experts have sounded the alarm about the risks to public health.
“Shale gas is extracted by hydrofracking. That means special chemicals are added to the water to break up the rock formations. The components of these chemicals are kept secret by the companies in the United States, who claim it's a commercial secret. But that water, laced with chemicals, ends up in drinking water. So shale gas development poses a serious threat to the environment and health,” warns Konstantin Simonov, the Head of the National Energy Security Fund.
Apart from being seen as unsafe, it is also described by many as too expensive and an inadequate replacement for natural gas.
“We're watching the situation, and we think that locally it's very viable, but it will remain a local gas supply,” comments Sergey Kupriyanov, spokesperson for the Russian gas giant, Gazprom. “It's impossible to extract gas at a loss for long. And if you look at the shale gas suppliers right now, you'll see that most of them are losing money.”
Experts say shale gas reserves in Ukraine may be the biggest in Europe, but it may take up to a decade to develop them.
Nevertheless, Kiev says next year it wants less Russian gas – slashing the amount it plans to buy by more than a third. The move violates the deal struck in 2009, and could see Europe’s energy supplies, once again, on shaky ground.
Another tussle over gas prices has left many in Europe worrying that there will be a new gas war and further disruption of supplies to Europe. But the Russian energy minister gave assurances that the events of 2009 will not be repeated, and that there is still time to find a compromise.
03.09.2011, 09:21
4 comments
‘War on terror’ - worth cost in lost lives and liberties?It is almost a decade since the 9/11 attacks on American soil that shook the country to its very core. 9/11 tragedy |
Washington adheres to zero effort principleThe American job sector continues to look bleak, as new figures show zero new jobs were created last month. Gerald Celente from the Trends Research Institute says Americans are facing cuts, while the banks are being given a get-out-of-jail-free card. US debt crisis |
Eastern Europe is turning into a true thrid world. Poland is proudly signing up for shale gas, and now Ukaine! Both of these countries can forget their healthy soil and water, and they will be importing food as their own land will become polluted beyond recognition. In US, many poor farmers have signed up to give leases over their land to gas corporations. They made nice money through such leases, but did not know the consequences. There are so many problems with the horizontal earth core fracturing, that it defies imagination. Even though drilling is well bellow water table, the "fracking" requires huge amount of fresh water to be pumped into the core for hydraulic fracturing. Nature of the chemicals is one problem. But another problem is even bigger: there is no way to CONTROL the gases coming out of fractured rock formation. At the point of fructure, the gas is sucked up to the surface, but there is much more gas -- including methane -- that escapes to the surface of the earth, causing pollution of water, rivers and land. As a result, millions of fish died in rivers of Arkansas and Lousinana, and millions of birds died eating poisoned fish. Cows died in pastures grazing on land where the pollutants surfaced. And HUNDREDS of earthquakes in the area not know for earthquakes before are the result of the disturbance to the earth's core. And in the end, only initial flow of gas is productive, then the production falls off. Damaged land will be the only legacy of this foolish adventure.
@ vlada isn't that gas still coming from Russia and for Germany to buy that gas and resell it ,wouldn't that mean even higher prices. of course I am not sure. anyway Germans may be as you say "civilized" ,but they are also not a very good friend. look at the euro zone Germany takes advantage of them because they are the second largest exporter in the world. If you look at "historically proven facts" then it obvious that the only people the germans are truely friends with are other germans. Ausria-hungary in ww1 ,Italy in ww2 (Northern Italy could very well be considered germanic). Russia has historical ties with Ukraine and I would not be surprised if in a few years the germans go crazy and try to take over Europe again. oh wait they basically already have ,economically at least.






Why would Ukraine get from Germany? Germany cannot provide Ukraine with cheaper gas, they get it from Russia in the first place. They would have to resell it at a higher price. Germans more civilized nation thats why they'll charge more civilized price, making Ukraine pay even more lol.