Political apathy looming over Ukraine ahead of D-day
Published: 05 February, 2010, 09:21
Edited: 06 February, 2010, 11:26
A man holds a pre-election leaflet of presidential candidate Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko, with a pre-election poster of presidential candidate Viktor Yanukovich in the background (AFP Photo / Getty Images)
(24.5Mb) embed videoTAGS: Election, Ukraine, Politics
A Ukrainian presidential candidate is threatening mass protests over a recent change to electoral law ahead of Sunday's presidential run-off, but the public have grown tired of the constant political turmoil.
Irina Bida took active part in the 2004 Orange Revolution in Ukraine. She was among a massive crowd demanding changes.
“We stood over there and saw a Ukrainian flag replaced with an orange one. It was so exciting. People were so emotional and positive,” she recalls.
Irina holds back tears thinking of how the hopes of her countrymen got crushed by political infighting.
“I work in a toy store and my colleague told me yesterday she can’t afford buying cheese for herself, only for her baby. I sometimes want to cry because I can’t change anything. And this election will not change anything,” Irina Bida believes.
Their cry for change turned Ukrainian politics upside down. The people had their voice heard and elected Viktor Yushchenko as president after a flawed election.
Five years on, as the nation has grown disillusioned with the ideals of the Orange Revolution, many say that those events in 2004 were completely unique – something which cannot happen again.
“The passion for changes which existed back then has now transformed into a routine waiting for changes. People gave out a lot of energy in 2004 – the energy which needs to be recharged, like in a battery. And the society is a massive battery, which could take decades to recharge,” says political analyst and writer Dmitry Vydrin.
Just days before the vote, the party of the front-running candidate Viktor Yanukovich pushed through amendments to the electoral law. They became effective after current President Yushchenko, soon to step down, ratified the changes, thus completely isolating himself from his former ally – Prime Minister Yulia Timoshenko.
Timoshenko was furious over the developments.
“If we are not able to technically provide a fair and free election, then I guarantee I will be taking people onto the streets. There’s no doubt about it,” Yulia Timoshenko promised.
Meanwhile, some now say that Timoshenko is considering withdrawing from the run-off. While the country is preparing to go to the polls again on Sunday, the apathy is changing to unease.
05.02.2010, 08:03
1 comment
First grader at 21Neglected by her parents and having slipped through the net of social services, Olga Sobur in Southern Russia is virtually illiterate at 21. Going to her school’s first grade she has a lot of catching up to do. |
Policemen killed in shootout with Chechen militantsFive policemen have been killed and seven more injured in a shootout with militants in Russia’s Southern Republic of Chechnya. |













Yulia Timoshenko is so grossly misrepresenting the change, that she is shooting herself in the foot. The change was made to close a loophole in the law. This loophole was created during "orange" time, when all sorts of tricks were used to make Yuschenko win. The loophole essentially allows two things: to allow representatives of one candidate to refuse to certify the vote at the precinct level, without getting specific charges in writing, and without identifying violations, and to walk out of the work of Commission depriving it of a quorum. This is an abuse of political power, and Yulia knows it. People selected to the Commission --- even though they are representatives of political parties --- work for the country as a whole, not their party bosses. The law, however, could have stayed without the change, if Yulia did not gloat how she was going to paralize the process. She should have publicly stated that reps of her party, serving on Electoral Commission will not leave their jobs, and will remain professionals committed to the investigation of complaints, and the final tally of the votes. Yulia would have shown that she is serious, patriotic candidate, that will respect the win of the voters, not signal ahead of time the path to the electoral paralysis. This is why the Parliamanet acted, and this is why the President signed it. Her lack of honesty here, and at this stage, is not helpfull. Not at all.