‘Sanctions against Syria won’t bear fruit’
Published: 04 December, 2011, 10:47
Edited: 05 December, 2011, 03:36
Syrian soldiers shout pro-Syrian President Bashar Assad slogans as they sit in the back of an army lorry (AFP Photo / STR)
(13.1Mb) embed videoTAGS: Conflict, Military, UN, Politics, Human rights, Marina Dzhashi, Opposition, Syria
The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights has called for military intervention in Syria to bring down the ruling regime as sanctions continue to be piled on Damascus. But political activist Franklin Lamb has doubts on how effective they can be.
According to Commissioner Navi Pillay, more than 4,000 people, including 307 children, have been killed in the last nine months of clashes between the government forces of President Bashar al-Assad and armed opposition.
The UN also condemned Assad's rule, but a resolution that could have paved the way for intervention was blocked by Russia and China.
They believe the UN continues to ignore reports of atrocities committed by opposition fighters – and warn that foreign meddling may worsen the situation.
Franklin Lamb says the regime is extremely nationalistic to be brought down by Western interference in the form of sanctions as the majority of population will strongly oppose them.
“The history going back to Iraq and before teaches us that sanctions are not really effective in changing the behavior of the regime – they are dramatic for local consumption,” Lamb claims, saying the US Congress’ thrills of sanctions against Syria and Iran will bring no fruit in real political terms.
“Both sides have got to find another way to defuse the situation,” he maintains.
Dr Ibrahim Alloush, a professor at Zaytouneh University in Jordan, doubts there can be a peaceful resolution to the crisis in Syria as the Arab League “simply wants to topple the Syrian regime and to replace it with a pro-American regime.”
“What’s taking place now is, in fact, an attempt by the Arab League to be used by the United States and NATO against one of the few remaining states in the Arab world that says ‘no’ to United States influence,” he told RT.
04.12.2011, 10:18
6 comments
Egyptian voters disillusionedIslamic parties have taken an overwhelming lead in the opening round of Egypt's first parliamentary elections since Mubarak's fall. However, the results are not final, as two further election rounds are to take place over the next two months. Egypt unrest |
04.12.2011, 13:08
19 comments
‘US cannot afford to open front against Pakistan’Last month’s attack by a NATO aircraft on Pakistani region that killed 24 soldiers has infuriated Islamabad. RT spoke to Hamid Gul, the country's former head of intelligence, about consequences the incident may have for US-Pakistani relations. |
It is completely untrue to say that the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay has called for military intervention in Syria. While she has urged the international community to act quickly to protect yet more civilians from being killed, she has at no point said that such action should be military in nature. There are a number of other actions that can be taken, targeted sanctions being one.
We would be grateful if RT would correct this misleading and damaging introduction to its article.
Rupert Colville
Spokesperson for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights








Jim Evans, you sure do use a lot of knee jerkhyperbole when someone makes one simple statement. Whew! Easy there. Wow, lot's of pro Syria/butcher Assad people here. Sad. Libya is still a work in prgress. Lavrov wants to save life but his friend Assad and his cronies are the people who violated their own syrian people's life and human rights by killing defenseless, unarmed civilians and before that they killed/murdered defenseless teenaged protesters. Wow! What a bunch of evildoers! Atrocious. How anyone can support people who do that must quite simply not have a conscience. so, of course, outright lying in an RT article (about what the UNHRC person said - She did not urge military intervention.)is par for Russia Today. I guess RT continues along the line of Soviet "Pravda" in the old days. There are no depths to which RT will not go. They simply are a propaganda machine for old Russia.