VERSIONS: روسيا اليوم NOTICIAS FREEVIDEO ИНОТВ RTД
breakingnews
Go to main page   News   Syrian referendum on new constitution announced for 26 Feb.  
MORE ON THE STORY
A Syrian man votes to elect representatives to the Local Administration Councils (LAC) in Damascus. (AFP Photo / Louai Beshara) 15.02, 18:47 9 comments

‘Elections in Syria better late than never’ - Lavrov

As Syrian authorities announce the adoption of a new constitution, Russian and European diplomats discuss a new UN Security Council resolution aimed at ending the civil strife in the embattled Arab republic.

Syria unrest
A member of the Druze community holds up a Syrian flag with a picture of Syria's President Bashar al-Assad. (Reuters / Baz Ratner) 15.02, 11:57 9 comments

Short sighted West eyes Syria on the brink

The situation in Syria is on a knife-edge, with reports of militants arriving in the country there are fears of an escalation in the conflict. Yet, the UN and West’s condemnation of Government crackdowns lays the blame at the feet of President Assad.

Syria unrest
Syrian army tanks are seen stationed at the entrance to Baba Amr neighbourhood in Homs (AFP Photo / Str) 14.02, 10:19 6 comments

Syria: Seeds of sectarian conflict

Spiraling violence wracks Syria and the foot dragging by the West and Arab League to find a resolution to the conflict looks set to continue. Also, the appearance of al-Qaeda on the scene triggers worries the unrest could take on a sectarian nature.

Syria unrest
Bashar Ja’afari, Syrian envoy to UN 14.02, 01:16 45 comments

Syria would not send troops to protect protesters at OWS – envoy to UN

UN is applying double standards towards Syria, the country’s envoy stated while addressing the General Assembly. He said that his country, like any sovereign state, has exclusive responsibility for maintaining security on its national territory.

Syria unrest

Syrian referendum on new constitution announced for 26 Feb.

Published: 15 February, 2012, 13:31
Edited: 16 February, 2012, 02:55

Mainly Syrian nationals living in Lebanon and supporters of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad hold his portraits during a demonstration. (AFP Photo / Anwar Amro)

(18.2Mb) embed video
TRENDS: Syria unrest

TAGS: Conflict, Politics, Human rights, Law, Maria Finoshina, Matt Trezza, Opposition, Syria


Syrian state TV has announced the government will hold a referendum on a new constitution on February 26, in an attempt to end the conflict that has wracked the country for 11 months.

President Assad has confirmed a new constitution has been drafted, but the referendum had previously been scheduled for March.

The draft constitution was handed over to Assad last week by members of the drafting committee. The new document reportedly includes a chapter that stipulates an end to the political monopoly of the ruling Baath party.

When the uprising against President Bashar al-Assad began in March last year, the opposition was pushing for constitutional reform.

In Washington, the referendum was dismissed as “laughable.”

"It makes a mockery of the Syrian revolution. Promises of reforms have been usually followed by increase in brutality and have never been delivered upon by this regime since the beginning of peaceful demonstrations in Syria," said White House spokesman Jay Carney on Wednesday.

The Syrian opposition groups now say that they will settle for nothing less than Assad’s resignation.

"A year ago, the opposition was demanding political reforms, now the chief spokesperson from the Syrian opposition abroad, and various rebel armed groups say nothing short of the fall of Assad, or even his execution, is acceptable,” Professor Mark Almond from the University of Bilkent in Turkey told RT.

Watch RT's full interview with Professor Mark Almond


embed video

Political analyst Omar Nashabe thinks President Assad is taking a huge step forward by presenting a new draft of the Syrian constitution.

The most crucial changes, Nashabe says, are removing the Baath party as the only party in the government, and proposing a seven-year presidential term with a maximum of two terms served.

Asked if the proposed constitution is sufficient for bringing the opposition to the negotiating table, Nashabe said it would be if it was for the opposition to decide – but strong Western influence could get in the way.

+27 (29 votes)
 
Back to top
next MORE NEWS
Syrian tanks are seen in Bab Amro near the city of Homs February 12, 2012. (Reuters / Mulham Alnader/Handout) 15.02, 13:03 19 comments

‘Assad must go to save Syria from intervention’

Syrian President Bashar Assad should resign if he doesn’t want to repeat the fate of Iraq’s Saddam Hussein and Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi, while Russia and China should help him to do so, the Middle East expert Tariq Ali told RT.

Syria unrest
An Iranian couple walk past a banner after a demonstration outside the University of Tehran. (Reuters / Morteza Nikoubazl) 15.02, 14:43 63 comments

SWIFT sanctions: West going to extremes to punish Iran

US wants Iran evicted from SWIFT, an independent financial clearinghouse that is crucial to the country's oil sales. This could immediately cripple Tehran’s financial lifeline, but would come with its own costs for the world economy.

Iran tension
art February 16, 2012, 08:35
0

=> The Monk wrote:

//In the history of the modern world, no dictator has allowed himself to be voted out of office.//

Wrong. Spain's Francisco Franco's successor son king Juan Carlos de Borbon recused himself of kingship and transfered the nation to parliamentary democracy. Three decades later, today, 'debt camp' Spain pan handles Jews for loans to pay its debt interests, and shivers in the cold for the Khazar Ashton's decision to cut Iranian oil to Spain.

RTrocks February 16, 2012, 07:07
+1

Wondering out loud...

What does the world lose if the Rothschilds/Rockefeller bloodlines were terminated and their assets seized and distributed equally/proportionally among all countries, their empires including the World Bank/IMF/UN/NATO/Private Central banks dismantled? There have been many innocent people killed before (especially at the hands of Rothschilds/Rockefellers)?

Would we risk the chance at world peace and happiness for the foreseeable future?




RTrocks February 16, 2012, 06:51
+2

What exactly will this new constitution entail? Will the details be swept under the carpet under "reforms".

Does the new constitution also include provisions for an outside controlled Central Bank in Syria?

As I recently read, there are only a few central banks which are NOT Rothschilds owned central banks. Iran has one, Syria too. Libya did have theirs but a Rothschild owned central bank was installed during the war there.

Is what the "terrorism" of the world is about? The fact that the remaining central banks are not Rothschild owned?